PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Anderson, Sean C. AU - Mulberry, Nicola AU - Edwards, Andrew M. AU - Stockdale, Jessica E. AU - Iyaniwura, Sarafa A. AU - Falcao, Rebeca C. AU - Otterstatter, Michael C. AU - Janjua, Naveed Z. AU - Coombs, Daniel AU - Colijn, Caroline TI - How much leeway is there to relax COVID-19 control measures? AID - 10.1101/2020.06.12.20129833 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.06.12.20129833 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/14/2020.06.12.20129833.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/14/2020.06.12.20129833.full AB - Following successful widespread non-pharmaceutical interventions aiming to control COVID-19, many jurisdictions are moving towards reopening economies and borders. Given that little immunity has developed in most populations, re-establishing higher contact rates within and between populations carries substantial risks. Using a Bayesian epidemiological model, we estimate the leeway to reopen in a range of national and regional jurisdictions that have experienced different COVID-19 epidemics. We estimate the risks associated with different levels of reopening and the likely burden of new cases due to introductions from other jurisdictions. We find widely varying leeway to reopen, high risks of exceeding past peak sizes, and high possible burdens per introduced case per week, up to hundreds in some jurisdictions. We recommend a cautious approach to reopening economies and borders, coupled with strong monitoring for changes in transmission.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by funding from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research and from Genome BC (project code COV-142). C.C. and J.S. are funded by the Federal Government of Canada's Canada 150 Research Chair program. We thank Fisheries and Oceans Canada for their support.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are publicly available. Code is provided on github.