PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Samantha B Kasloff
AU  - James E Strong
AU  - Duane Funk
AU  - Todd Cutts
TI  - Stability of SARS-CoV-2 on Critical Personal Protective Equipment
AID  - 10.1101/2020.06.11.20128884
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.06.11.20128884
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/12/2020.06.11.20128884.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/12/2020.06.11.20128884.full
AB  - The spread of COVID-19 in healthcare settings is concerning, with healthcare workers representing a disproportionately high percentage of confirmed cases. Although SARS-CoV-2 virus has been found to persist on surfaces for a number of days, the extent and duration of fomites as a mode of transmission, particularly in healthcare settings, has not been fully characterized. To shed light on this critical matter, the present study provides the first comprehensive assessment of SARS-CoV-2 stability on experimentally contaminated personal protective equipment (PPE) widely used by healthcare workers and the general public. Persistence of viable virus was monitored over 21 days on eight different materials, including nitrile medical examination gloves, reinforced chemical resistant gloves, N-95 and N-100 particulate respirator masks, Tyvek®, plastic, cotton, and stainless steel. Unlike previous reports, viable SARS-CoV-2 in the presence of a soil load persisted for up to 21 days on experimentally inoculated PPE, including materials from filtering facepiece respirators (N-95 and N-100 masks) and a plastic visor. Conversely, when applied to 100% cotton fabric, the virus underwent rapid degradation and became undetectable in less than 24 hours. These findings underline the importance of appropriate handling of contaminated PPE during and following use in high-risk settings and provide interesting insight into the potential utility of cotton, including cotton masks, in limiting COVID-19 transmission.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding for this research was provided by the Public Health Agency of Canada.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The research conducted includes no clinical samples, nor human or animal subjects. No IRB nor ethics committee approvals were required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData and associated protocols can be made available to readers without undue qualifications in material transfer agreements.