RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Point of care lung ultrasound is useful when screening for CoVid-19 in Emergency Department patients JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.06.09.20123836 DO 10.1101/2020.06.09.20123836 A1 Paul Walsh A1 Andrea Hankins A1 Heejung Bang YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/12/2020.06.09.20123836.abstract AB Background CoVid-19 can be a life-threatening lung disease or a trivial upper respiratory infection depending on whether the alveoli are involved. Emergency department (ED) screening in symptomatic patients with normal vital signs is frequently limited to oro-nasopharyngeal swabs. We tested the null hypothesis that patients being screened for CoVid-19 in the ED with normal vital signs and without hypoxia would have a point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) consistent with CoVid-19 less than 2% of the time.Subjects Subjects were identified from ED ultrasound logs.Inclusion criteria Age 14 years or older with symptoms prompting ED screening for CoVid-19.Exclusion criteria Known congestive heart failure or other chronic lung condition likely to cause excessive B lines on LUS.Intervention Structured blinded ultrasound review and chart reviewAnalysis We used a two-sided exact hypothesis test for binomial random variables. We also measured LUS diagnostic performance using computed tomography as the gold standard.Results We reviewed 77 charts; 49 met inclusion criteria. Vital signs were normal in 30/49 patients; 10 (33%) of these patients had LUS consistent with CoVid-19. We rejected the null hypothesis (p-value < 0.001). The treating physicians’ interpretation of their own point of care lung ultrasounds had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 75%, 100%) and specificity of 80% (95% CI 68%, 89%).Conclusion LUS has a meaningful detection rate for CoVid-19 in symptomatic ED patients with normal vital signs. We recommend at least LUS be used in addition to PCR testing when screening symptomatic ED patients for CoVid-19.What is known Auscultation and chest x-ray are insufficient to screen for lung involvement when SARS-CoV-2 infection is suspected. Point of care lung ultrasound is widely available, safer, and less resource intensive than CT imaging.What we found In symptomatic patients presenting to the ED even those with normal vital signs had point of care lung ultrasound evidence of alveolar level involvement 33%of patients. Point of care lung ultrasound was 100% sensitive and 80% specific compared to CT (reference standard) when evaluating patients for Covid-19.What this adds Point of care lung ultrasound or similar imaging should performed when screening symptomatic patients in whom SARS-CoV-2 infection is suspected.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project was supported in part by the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Foundation (Walsh), and by The National Institutes of Health through grant UL1 TR001860 (Bang). The ultrasound machine was provided by The Sutter Medical Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The institutional review and privacy boards for Sutter Health approved this study and granted a waiver of informed consent (approval number 1597263).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesStatistical code used in the analysis is available but the data is not but a public use dataset may be released with a peer-reviewed publication.