RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Improving Precision and Power in Randomized Trials for COVID-19 Treatments Using Covariate Adjustment, for Binary, Ordinal, and Time-to-Event Outcomes JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.04.19.20069922 DO 10.1101/2020.04.19.20069922 A1 David Benkeser A1 Iván Díaz A1 Alex Luedtke A1 Jodi Segal A1 Daniel Scharfstein A1 Michael Rosenblum YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/11/2020.04.19.20069922.abstract AB Time is of the essence in evaluating potential drugs and biologics for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19. There are currently over 400 clinical trials (phase 2 and 3) of treatments for COVID-19 registered on clinicaltrials.gov. Covariate adjustment is a statistical analysis method with potential to improve precision and reduce the required sample size for a substantial number of these trials. Though covariate adjustment is recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, it is underutilized, especially for the types of outcomes (binary, ordinal and time-to-event) that are common in COVID-19 trials. To demonstrate the potential value added by covariate adjustment in this context, we simulated two-arm, randomized trials comparing a hypothetical COVID-19 treatment versus standard of care, where the primary outcome is binary, ordinal, or time-to-event. Our simulated distributions are derived from two sources: longitudinal data on over 500 patients hospitalized at Weill Cornell Medicine New York Presbyterian Hospital, and a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) preliminary description of 2449 cases. We found substantial precision gains from using covariate adjustment-equivalent to 9-21% reductions in the required sample size to achieve a desired power-for a variety of estimands (targets of inference) when the trial sample size was at least 200. We provide an R package and practical recommendations for implementing covariate adjustment. The estimators that we consider are robust to model misspecification.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAL was supported by the National Institutes of Health under award number DP2-LM013340. MR was supported by the Johns Hopkins Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation funded by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) U01FD005942. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the aforementioned organizations.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe patient level data used to inform our simulations is not available to be shared.