PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Lee Worden AU - Rae Wannier AU - Seth Blumberg AU - Alex Y. Ge AU - George W. Rutherford AU - Travis C. Porco TI - Estimation of effects of contact tracing and mask adoption on COVID-19 transmission in San Francisco: a modeling study AID - 10.1101/2020.06.09.20125831 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.06.09.20125831 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/11/2020.06.09.20125831.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/11/2020.06.09.20125831.full AB - The current COVID-19 pandemic has spurred concern about what interventions may be effective at reducing transmission. The city and county of San Francisco imposed a shelter-in-place order in March 2020, followed by use of a contact tracing program and a policy requiring use of cloth face masks. We used statistical estimation and simulation to estimate the effectiveness of these interventions in San Francisco. We estimated that self-isolation and other practices beginning at the time of San Francisco’s shelter-in-place order reduced the effective reproduction number of COVID-19 by 35.4% (95% CI, −20.1%–81.4%). We estimated the effect of contact tracing on the effective reproduction number to be a reduction of approximately 44% times the fraction of cases that are detected, which may be modest if the detection rate is low. We estimated the impact of cloth mask adoption on reproduction number to be approximately 8.6%, and note that the benefit of mask adoption may be substantially greater for essential workers and other vulnerable populations, residents return to circulating outside the home more often. We estimated the effect of those interventions on incidence by simulating counterfactual scenarios in which contact tracing was not adopted, cloth masks were not adopted, and neither contact tracing nor cloth masks was adopted, and found increases in case counts that were modest, but relatively larger than the effects on reproduction numbers. These estimates and model results suggest that testing coverage and timing of testing and contact tracing may be important, and that modest effects on reproduction numbers can nonetheless cause substantial effects on case counts over time.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementLW and TCP acknowledge support from the US NIH NIGMS MIDAS program, U01-GM130900. The views, opinions, assumptions and conclusions or any other information set out in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIH.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:No IRB was needed for this study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis manuscript used only publicly available data.