RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Scrutinizing the heterogeneous spreading of COVID-19 outbreak in Brazilian territory
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.05.20123604
DO 10.1101/2020.06.05.20123604
A1 Rafael M. da Silva
A1 Carlos F.O. Mendes
A1 Cesar Manchein
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/09/2020.06.05.20123604.abstract
AB After the spread of COVID-19 out of China, the evolution of the pandemic shows remarkable similarities and differences among countries across the world. Eventually, such characteristics are also observed between different regions of the same country. Herewith, we study the heterogeneous spreading of the confirmed infected cases and deaths by the COVID-19 until May 30th, 2020, in the Brazilian territory, which has been seen as the current epicenter of the pandemic in South America. Our first set of results is related to the similarities and it shows that: (i) a power-law growth of the cumulative number of infected people is observed for federative units of the five regions of Brazil; and (ii) the Distance Correlation (DC) calculated between the time series of the most affected federative units and the curve that describes the evolution of the pandemic in Brazil remains about 1 in most of the time, while such quantity calculated for the federative units with a low incidence of newly infected people remains about 0.95. In the second set of results, we focus on the heterogeneous distribution of the confirmed cases and deaths, which is demonstrated by the fact that only three regions concentrate 92% of the cases. By applying the epidemiological SIRD model we estimated the effective reproduction number ℛe during the pandemic evolution and found that: (i) the mean value of ℛe for the eight most affected federative units in Brazil is about 2; (ii) the current value of ℛe for Brazil is greater than 1, which indicates that the epidemic peak is far; and (iii) Ceará was the only federative unit for which the current ℛe < 1. Based on these findings, we projected the effects of increase or decrease the effective reproduction number and concluded that if the value of ℛe increases 20%, not only the peak might grow at least 40% but also its occurrence might be anticipated, which hastens the collapse of the public health care system. In all cases, to keep the effective reproduction number 20% below the current one can save thousands of people in the long term.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors have declared no external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The authors have declared no necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data used in this study are openly available in Ref. 30 of the manuscript. https://covid.saude.gov.br/