TY - JOUR T1 - Clinical evaluation of self-collected saliva by RT-qPCR, direct RT-qPCR, RT-LAMP, and a rapid antigen test to diagnose COVID-19 JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.06.06.20124123 SP - 2020.06.06.20124123 AU - Mayu Ikeda AU - Kazuo Imai AU - Sakiko Tabata AU - Kazuyasu Miyoshi AU - Nami Murahara AU - Tsukasa Mizuno AU - Midori Horiuchi AU - Kento Kato AU - Yoshitaka Imoto AU - Maki Iwata AU - Satoshi Mimura AU - Toshimitsu Ito AU - Kaku Tamura AU - Yasuyuki Kato Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/08/2020.06.06.20124123.abstract N2 - Background The clinical performance of six molecular diagnostic tests and a rapid antigen test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were clinically evaluated for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in self-collected saliva.Methods Saliva samples from 103 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 (15 asymptomatic and 88 symptomatic) were collected on the day of hospital admission. SARS-CoV-2 RNA in saliva was detected using a quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) laboratory-developed tes (LDT), a cobas SARS-CoV-2 high-throughput system, three direct RT-qPCR kits, and reverse-transcription loop mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP). Viral antigen was detected by a rapid antigen immunochromatographic assay.Results Of the 103 samples, viral RNA was detected in 50.5–81.6% of the specimens by molecular diagnostic tests and an antigen was detected in 11.7% of the specimens by the rapid antigen test. Viral RNA was detected at a significantly higher percentage (65.6–93.4%) in specimens collected within 9 d of symptom onset compared to that of specimens collected after at least 10 d of symptom onset (22.2–66.7%) and that of asymptomatic patients (40.0–66.7%). Viral RNA was more frequently detected in saliva from males than females.Conclusions Self-collected saliva is an alternative specimen diagnosing COVID-19. LDT RT-qPCR, cobas SARS-CoV-2 high-throughput system, direct RT-qPCR except for one commercial kit, and RT-LAMP showed sufficient sensitivity in clinical use to be selectively used according to clinical settings and facilities. The rapid antigen test alone is not recommended for initial COVID-19 diagnosis because of its low sensitivity.Key points Six molecular diagnostic tests showed equivalent and sufficient sensitivity in clinical use in diagnosing COVID-19 in self-collected saliva samples. However, a rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen test alone is not recommended for use without further study.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Health, Labour and Welfare Policy Research Grants, Research on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases and Immunization [grant number 20HA2002].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was reviewed and approved by the Self-Defense Forces Central Hospital (approval number 02-024) and International University of Health and Welfare (20-Im-002-2).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe raw data used in this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. ER -