TY - JOUR T1 - The Impact of Management on Hospital Performance JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.06.02.20119545 SP - 2020.06.02.20119545 AU - Miqdad Asaria AU - Benjamin Gershlick AU - Alistair McGuire AU - Andrew Street Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/05/2020.06.02.20119545.abstract N2 - Background There is a prevailing popular belief that expenditure on management by healthcare providers is wasteful, diverts resources from patient care, and distracts medical and nursing staff from getting on with their jobs. There is little existing evidence to support this narrative or counter-claims.Methods We explore the relationship between management and public sector hospital performance using a fixed effects empirical econometric specification on a panel data set consisting of 97 non-specialist acute National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England for the financial years 2012/13 to 2018/19. Measures of managerial input and quality of management practice are constructed from NHS Electronic Staff Records and NHS Staff Survey data. Hospital accounts and Hospital Episode Statistics data are used to construct five measures of financial performance and of timely and high quality care.Results We find some evidence that hospitals with more managers are more likely to achieve elective waiting targets and treat more patients. There is no evidence of an association between either the amount or quality of management input for the other measures of hospital performance.Conclusion There is limited variation in managerial input across NHS hospitals suggesting managers may have limited discretion in performing their managerial functions, being tightly circumscribed by official guidance, targets, and other factors outside their control. Given these constraints, the lack of strong evidence of associations between managerial input and NHS hospital performance is unsurprising.JEL Classification M12, I11, L25, C33, J21Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThe study is based on administrative dataFunding StatementThis work was funded by a grant from The Health FoundationAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval was not required for this studyAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used in the manuscript are publicly available administrative datasets. ER -