RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Motor somatotopy impacts imagery strategy success in human intracortical brain-computer interfaces JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2024.08.01.24311180 DO 10.1101/2024.08.01.24311180 A1 Kunigk, N.G. A1 Schone, H.R. A1 Gontier, C. A1 Hockeimer, W. A1 Tortolani, A.F. A1 Hatsopoulos, N.G. A1 Downey, J.E. A1 Chase, S.M. A1 Boninger, M.L. A1 Dekleva, B.D. A1 Collinger, J.L. YR 2024 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/03/2024.08.01.24311180.abstract AB The notion of a somatotopically organized motor cortex, with movements of different body parts being controlled by spatially distinct areas of cortex, is well known. However, recent studies have challenged this notion and suggested a more distributed representation of movement control. This shift in perspective has significant implications, particularly when considering the implantation location of electrode arrays for intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs). We sought to evaluate whether the location of neural recordings from the precentral gyrus, and thus the underlying somatotopy, has any impact on the imagery strategies that can enable successful iBCI control. Three individuals with a spinal cord injury were enrolled in an ongoing clinical trial of an iBCI. Participants had two intracortical microelectrode arrays implanted in the arm and/or hand areas of the precentral gyrus based on presurgical functional imaging. Neural data were recorded while participants attempted to perform movements of the hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder. We found that electrode arrays that were located more medially recorded significantly more activity during attempted proximal arm movements (elbow, shoulder) than did lateral arrays, which captured more activity related to attempted distal arm movements (hand, wrist). We also evaluated the relative contribution from the two arrays implanted in each participant to decoding accuracy during calibration of an iBCI decoder for translation and grasping tasks. For both task types, imagery strategy (e.g., reaching vs. wrist movements) had a significant impact on the relative contributions of each array to decoding. Overall, we found some evidence of broad tuning to arm and hand movements; however, there was a clear bias in the amount of information accessible about each movement type in spatially distinct areas of cortex. These results demonstrate that classical concepts of somatotopy can have real consequences for iBCI use, and highlight the importance of considering somatotopy when planning iBCI implantation.Competing Interest StatementN.H. has a consulting agreement with Blackrock Microsystems.Clinical TrialNCT01894802Clinical Protocols https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01894802 Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers UH3NS107714 and R01NS121079, as well as the Swiss National Science Foundation under Award Number P500PM_210800.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was conducted under an Investigational Device Exemption from the Food and Drug Administration and approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the University of Pittsburgh and the University of Chicago. This study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01894802). Informed consent was obtained from all participants before any study procedures were conducted. All research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and with local statutory requirements.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData supporting the findings of this study will be available upon request and completion of a brief data use agreement at https://dabi.loni.usc.edu.