PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Hong Xu
AU  - Yong Gan
AU  - Daikun Zheng
AU  - Bo Wu
AU  - Xian Zhu
AU  - Chang Xu
AU  - Chenglu Liu
AU  - Zhou Tao
AU  - Yaoyue Hu
AU  - Min Chen
AU  - Mingjing Li
AU  - Zuxun Lu
AU  - Jack Chen
TI  - The Relationship Between COVID-19 Infection and Risk Perception, Knowledge, Attitude As Well As Four Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) During the Late Period Of The COVID-19 Epidemic In China – An Online Cross-sectional Survey of 8158 Adults
AID  - 10.1101/2020.06.02.20120808
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.06.02.20120808
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/04/2020.06.02.20120808.1.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/04/2020.06.02.20120808.1.full
AB  - Background So far, there has been no published population study on the relationship between COVID-19 infection and public’s risk perception, information source, knowledge, attitude and four non-pharmaceutical interventions(NPI: hand washing, proper coughing habits, social distancing and mask wearing) during the COVID-19 outbreak in China.Methods An online survey of 8158 Chinese adults between 22 February to 5 March 2020 was conducted. Bivariate associations between categorical variables were examined using Fisher exact test. We also explored the determinants of four NPIs as well as their association with COVID-19 infection using logistic regression.Results Of 8158 adults included, 57 (0.73%) were infected with COVID-19. The overwhelming majority of respondents showed a positive attitude (99.2%), positive risk perception (99.9%) and high knowledge levels that were among the strongest predictors of four highly adopted NPIs (hand washing:96.8%; proper coughing: 93.1%; social distancing:87.1%; mask wearing:97.9%). There was an increased risk of COVID-19 infection for those who not washing hands (2.28% vs 0.65%; RR=3.53: 95%CI: 1.53-8.15; P<0.009); not practicing proper coughing (1.79% vs 0.73%; RR=2.44: 95%CI: 1.15-5.15;P=0.026); not practicing social distancing (1.52% vs 0.58%; RR=2.63:95%CI:1.48 – 4.67; P=0.002); and not wearing a mask (7.41% vs 0.6%; RR=12.38:95%CI:5.81-26.36; P<0.001). For those who did practice all other three NPIs, wearing mask was associated with significantly reduced risk of infection compared to those who did not wear a mask (0.6% vs 16.7%; p=0.035). Similarly, for those who did not practice all or part of the other three NPIs, wearing mask was also associated with significantly reduced risk of infection. In a penalised logistic regression model including all four NPIs, wearing a mask was the only significant predictor of COVID-19 infection among four NPIs (OR=7.20; 95%CI:2.24-23.11; p<0.001).Conclusions We found high levels of risk perception, positive attitude, desirable knowledge as well as a high level of adopting four NPIs. The relevant knowledge, risk perception and attitude were strong predictors of adapting the four NPIs. Mask wearing, among four personal NPIs, was the most effective protective measure against COVID-19 infection with added preventive effect among those who practised all or part of the other three NPIs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialN/AFunding StatementThe School of Public Health & Management of Chongqing Medical University and The Science and Technology Association of Chongqing Municipal Government provided financial support for this research project. The funding bodies played no roles in the design, conduct, analysis of the study and publishing of the study results.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University approved our study protocol. There was an introduction document before the study questionnaire that provided the respondents with the background, aims and estimated time (10 minutes) for completing the survey. Respondents were asked for their agreement to participate the study and to answer the questions faithfully and assured confidentiality and anonymity, and no individual data will be disclosed.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due ongoing research effort and data analysis by the team but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.