TY - JOUR T1 - DNA methylation differences at birth after conception through assisted reproductive technologies JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.03.16.20037044 SP - 2020.03.16.20037044 AU - Elmar W. Tobi AU - Catarina Almqvist AU - Anna Hedman AU - Ellika Andolf AU - Jan Holte AU - Jan I. Olofsson AU - Håkan Wramsby AU - Margaretha Wramsby AU - Göran Pershagen AU - Bastiaan T. Heijmans AU - Anastasia N. Iliadou Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/03/2020.03.16.20037044.abstract N2 - Study Question What is the relationship with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and DNA methylation (DNAm) patterns in cord-blood and is there any difference between in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)?Summary Answer We identify nineteen CpGs at which DNAm was associated with being conceived via assisted reproductive technology (ART). No difference was found between IVF and ICSI.What is known already Prior studies on either IVF or ICSI show conflicting outcomes as both widespread effects on DNAm and highly localized associations have been reported. No study on both IVF and ICSI and genome-wide neonatal DNAm has been performed.Study design, size, duration We measured 87 infants conceived with in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and 70 who were not in a cross-sectional study.Participants/materials, setting, methods Participants were from the UppstART study, which were recruited from fertility and reproductive health clinics, and the Born into Life cohort, which is created from the larger LifeGene study. We measured DNAm from DNA extracted from cord blood collected at birth with the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450k BeadChip micro-array. Group differences in DNA methylation at individual CpG dinucleotides (CpGs) were determined using robust linear models and post-hoc Tukey’s tests.Main results and the role of chance We found no association with global methylation levels, imprinted loci and meta-stable epialleles. In contrast, we identify nineteen CpGs at which DNA methylation was associated with being conceived via ART (effect estimates: 0.5-4.9%, PFDR<0.05), but no difference was found between IVF and ICSI. The associated CpGs map to genes related to brain function/development or genes connected to the plethora of conditions linked to subfertility, but functional annotation did not point to likely functional consequences.Limitations, reasons for caution We measured DNAm in cord blood and not at later ages and/or other tissues and findings remain to be replicated in an independent study.Wider implications of the findings We find ART is associated with DNA methylation differences in cord blood, but these differences are limited in number, effect size and with unknown functional consequences in adult blood. We did not find indications for a disparity between IVF and ICSI.Study funding/competing interest(s) The authors declare no competing interests. The funders had no role in the study, study design, analysis and decision to publish.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementEWT was supported by a VENI grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (91617128) and JPI-HDHL project PREcisE funded through ZonMw (529051023). Financial support was provided from the European Union Seventh Framework Program IDEAL (259679), the Swedish Research Council (K2011-69X-21871-01-6, 2011-3060 and 2018-02640), and the Strategic Research Program in Epidemiology Young Scholar Awards, Karolinska Institute (to ANI) and through the Swedish Initiative for Research on Microdata in the Social And Medical Sciences (SIMSAM) framework grant no 340-2013-5867, grants provided by the Stockholm County Council (ALF-projects), the Strategic Research Program in Epidemiology at Karolinska Institutet, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation and Danderyd University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAccess to the Data is available upon request ER -