RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Amyloid-β PET and CSF in an autopsy confirmed cohort
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.02.20119891
DO 10.1101/2020.06.02.20119891
A1 Juhan Reimand
A1 Baayla D.C. Boon
A1 Lyduine E. Collij
A1 Charlotte E. Teunissen
A1 Annemieke J.M. Rozemuller
A1 Bart N.M. van Berckel
A1 Philip Scheltens
A1 Rik Ossenkoppele
A1 Femke Bouwman
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/02/2020.06.02.20119891.abstract
AB Objective Accumulation of amyloid-β is among the earliest changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (PET) and Aβ42 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) both assess amyloid-β pathology in-vivo, but 10–20% of cases show discordant (CSF+/PET- or CSF-/PET+) results. The neuropathological correspondence with amyloid-β CSF/PET discordance is unknown.Methods We included 21 patients from our tertiary memory clinic who had undergone both CSF Aβ42 analysis and amyloid-β PET, and had neuropathological data available. Amyloid-β PET and CSF results were compared with neuropathological ABC scores (comprising of Thal (A), Braak (B) and CERAD (C) stage, all ranging from 0 [low] to 3 [high]) and neuropathological diagnosis.Results Neuropathological diagnosis was AD in 11 (52%) patients. Amyloid-β PET was positive in all A3, C2 and C3 cases and in one of the two A2 cases. CSF Aβ42 was positive in 92% of A2/A3 and 90% of C2/C3 cases. PET and CSF were discordant in 3/21 (14%) cases: CSF+/PET- in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (A0B0C0), CSF+/PET- in a patient with FTLD-TDP type B (A2B1C1), and CSF-/PET+ in a patient with AD (A3B3C3). Two CSF+/PET+ cases had a non-AD neuropathological diagnosis, i.e. FTLD-TDP type E (A3B1C1) and adult-onset leukoencephalopathy with axonal spheroids (A1B1C0).Interpretation Our findings confirm amyloid-β CSF/PET discordance with a range of possible reasons. Furthermore, amyloid-β biomarker positivity on both PET and CSF did not invariably result in an AD diagnosis at autopsy, illustrating the importance of considering relevant co-morbidities when evaluating amyloid-β biomarker results.Competing Interest StatementBB and AR received funding of the NIH (R01AG061775). CT received grants from the European Commission, the Dutch Research Council (ZonMW), Association of Frontotemporal Dementia/Alzheimers Drug Discovery Foundation, The Weston Brain Institute, Alzheimer Netherlands. CT has functioned in advisory boards of Roche, received non-financial support in the form of research consumables from ADx Neurosciences and Euroimmun, performed contract research or received grants from Probiodrug, Biogen, Esai, Toyama, Janssen prevention center, Boehringer, AxonNeurosciences, EIP farma, PeopleBio, Roche. BvB. received research support from ZON-MW, AVID radiopharmaceuticals, CTMM and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. BvB is a trainer for Piramal and GE; he receives no personal honoraria. PS has received consultancy/speaker fees (paid to the institution) from Biogen, People Bio, Roche (Diagnostics), Novartis Cardiology. PS is PI of studies with Vivoryon, EIP Pharma, IONIS, CogRx, AC Immune and Toyama. JR, LC, RO, and FB report no competing interests. The funding sources were not involved in the writing of this article or in the decision to submit it for publication.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The institutional review board of the VU University Medical Center approved all studies from which the current data was gathered and retrospectively analyzed. All patients provided written informed consent for their data to be used for research purposes. Brain donors or their next of kin signed informed consent regarding the usage of brain tissue and clinical records for research purposes.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is not publicly available.