TY - JOUR T1 - Health impact of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL): findings from a UK population-based cohort JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.05.30.20117549 SP - 2020.05.30.20117549 AU - Maxine Lamb AU - Alexandra G Smith AU - Daniel Painter AU - Eleanor Kane AU - Tim Bagguley AU - Robert Newton AU - Debra Howell AU - Gordon Cook AU - Ruth de Tute AU - Andrew Rawstron AU - Russell Patmore AU - Eve Roman Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/01/2020.05.30.20117549.abstract N2 - Objective To examine co-morbidity patterns in individuals with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL), both before and after premalignancy diagnosis; and compare their activity to that of the general population.Design Population-based patient cohort, within which each patient is matched at diagnosis to 10 age and sex-matched individuals from the general population. Both cohorts are linked to nationwide information on deaths, cancer registrations, and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES).Setting The UK’s Haematological Malignancy Research Network; which has a catchment population of around 4 million served by 14 hospitals and a central diagnostic laboratory.Participants All patients newly diagnosed 2009–15 with MGUS (n = 2203) or MBL (n = 561), and their age and sex-matched comparators (n = 27,638).Main Outcome measures Survival, and hospital inpatient and outpatient activity in the five years before, and three years after, diagnosis.Results Individuals with MGUS experienced excess morbidity in the 5-years before diagnosis, and excess mortality and morbidity in the 3-years after. Increased rate-ratios (RR) were evident for nearly all clinical specialties; the largest, both before and after diagnosis, being for nephrology (before RR = 4.38, 95% Confidence Interval 3.99–4.81; after RR = 14.7, 95% CI 13.5–15.9) and rheumatology (before RR = 3.38, 95% CI 3.16–3.61; after RR = 5.45, 95% CI 5.09–5.83). Strong effects were also evident for endocrinology, neurology, dermatology and respiratory medicine. Conversely, only marginal increases in mortality and morbidity were evident for MBL.Conclusions From a haematological malignancy perspective, MGUS and MBL are generally considered to be relatively benign. Nonetheless, monoclonal gammopathy has the potential to cause systemic disease and wide-ranging damage to most organs and tissues. Hence, even though most people with monoclonal immunoglobulins never develop a B-cell malignancy or suffer from any other form of M-protein related organ/tissue related disorder, the consequences for those that do can be extremely serious.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by Cancer Research UK, grant numbers 18362 and 29685; and Blood Cancer UK, grant number 15037Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Haematological Malignancy Research Network has ethics approval (REC 04/01205/69) from Leeds West Ethics Committee, R&D approval from each NHS Trust, and exemption from Section 251 of the Health & Social Care Act (PIAG 1-05 9h)/2007)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesEthical approvals and data restrictions mean that data cannot be shared; but collaborative projects can be undertaken. The corresponding author can be contacted for more information. ER -