PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Scott Sheffield
AU  - Anna York
AU  - Nicole Swartwood
AU  - Alyssa Bilinski
AU  - Anne Williamson
AU  - Meagan Fitzpatrick
TI  - Strict Physical Distancing May Be More Efficient: A mathematical argument for making the lockdowns count
AID  - 10.1101/2020.05.19.20107045
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.05.19.20107045
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/29/2020.05.19.20107045.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/29/2020.05.19.20107045.full
AB  - COVID-19 created a global public health and economic emergency. Policymakers acted quickly and decisively to contain the spread of disease through physical distancing measures. However, these measures also impact physical, mental and economic well-being, creating difficult trade-offs. Here we use a simple mathematical model to explore the balance between public health measures and their associated social and economic costs. Across a range of cost-functions and model structures, commitment to intermittent and strict social distancing measures leads to better overall outcomes than temporally consistent implementation of moderate physical distancing measures. With regard to the trade-offs that policymakers may soon face, our results emphasize that economic and health outcomes do not exist in full competition. Compared to consistent moderation, intermittently strict policies can better mitigate the impact of the pandemic on both of these priorities for a range of plausible utility functions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was received for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is generated from easily reproducible simulations, the source code (which expands on the Mathematica code presented and annotated in Appendix H) is provided as a Supplementary file.