TY - JOUR T1 - Aerosol blocking assessment by different types of fabrics for homemade respiratory masks: spectroscopy and imaging study JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.05.26.20100529 SP - 2020.05.26.20100529 AU - Mauricio Foschini AU - Adamo Ferreira Gomes Monte AU - Ana Caroline Moreira Mendes AU - Renata Scarabucci Janones AU - Alexandre Maletta AU - Carla Denari Giuliani AU - Bruna Aparecida Rodrigues Duarte AU - Kleber Del-Claro Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/27/2020.05.26.20100529.abstract N2 - During the COVID-19 pandemic, there is no agreement, until the current date, about the recommendations of homemade face mask use for the general population, and one of the reasons is a lack of information about their real protective rule on spreading aerosols and viruses. This is a comparative study regarding the relative efficiencies of commercial respiratory masks (medical masks) and homemade fabric masks, which may guide authorities across the globe, following the “Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19”, by the World Health Organization. We described two optical methodologies for charactering respiratory masks. It happens that the aerosol scattering coefficient is linear as a function of its concentration inside the mask chamber. Quantitative optical properties of scattering for a large batch fabrication of masks were demonstrated, making the mask N95 suitable for use as a reference standard.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by CNPq-Brazil.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. ER -