@article {Peixoto2020.05.26.20098244, author = {Vasco Ricoca Peixoto and Andr{\'e} Vieira and Pedro Aguiar and Carlos Carvalho and Daniel Thomas and Alexandre Abrantes and Public Health Research Center, National School of Public Health, Portugal}, title = {Rapid assessment of the impact of {\textquotedblleft}lockdown{\textquotedblright} on the COVID-19 epidemic in Portugal}, elocation-id = {2020.05.26.20098244}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1101/2020.05.26.20098244}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Background Portugal took early action to control the COVID19 epidemic, imposing a lockdown on March 16 when it recorded only 62 cases of COVID-19 per million inhabitants and no reported deaths. The Portuguese people complied quickly, reducing their overall mobility by 80\%. We estimate the impact of the lockdown in Portugal in terms of reducing burden on the health service.Methods We forecasted epidemic curves for: Cases, hospital inpatients (overall and in ICU), and deaths without lockdown, assuming that the impact of containment measures would start 14 days after lockdown was implemented. We used exponential smoothing models for deaths, intensive care (ICU) and hospitalizations and an ARIMA model for number of cases. Models were selected considering fitness to the observed data to the 31st of March 2020. We then compared observed(with intervention) and forecasted curves (without intervention).Results Between April 1 and April 15, there were 146 fewer deaths(-25\%), 5568 fewer cases (-23\%) and, as of April 15, there were 519 fewer ICU inpatients(-69\%) and 508 fewer overall hospital inpatients(-28\%) than forecasted without lockdown. On April 15 the number of ICU inpatients could have reached 748, three times higher than the observed value (229) if the intervention had been delayed.Conclusion If the lockdown had not been implemented in mid-March, Portugal ICU capacity (528 ICU beds) would likely have been breached in the first half of April. The lockdown seems to have been effective in reducing transmission of SARS-Cov-2, serious Covid-19 illness and associated mortality, thereby decreasing demand on health services. Early action allowed time for the National Health Service to acquire protective equipment, to increase capacity to test and cope with the surge in hospital and ICU demand caused by the pandemic.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:National School of Public HealthAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is publicly available from official Portuguese Directorate-General of Health https://covid19.min-saude.pt/relatorio-de-situacao/}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/27/2020.05.26.20098244}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/27/2020.05.26.20098244.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }