PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Antoniou, Austin A. AU - McGinley, Regan AU - Metzler, Marina AU - Chaudhari, Bimal P. TI - NeoGx: Machine-Recommended Rapid Genome Sequencing for Neonates AID - 10.1101/2024.06.24.24309403 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.06.24.24309403 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/25/2024.06.24.24309403.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/25/2024.06.24.24309403.full AB - Background Genetic disease is common in the Level IV Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), but neonatology providers are not always able to identify the need for genetic evaluation. We trained a machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict the need for genetic testing within the first 18 months of life using health record phenotypes.Methods For a decade of NICU patients, we extracted Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms from clinical text with Natural Language Processing tools. Considering multiple feature sets, classifier architectures, and hyperparameters, we selected a classifier and made predictions on a validation cohort of 2,241 Level IV NICU admits born 2020-2021.Results Our classifier had ROC AUC of 0.87 and PR AUC of 0.73 when making predictions during the first week in the Level IV NICU. We simulated testing policies under which subjects begin testing at the time of first ML prediction, estimating diagnostic odyssey length both with and without the additional benefit of pursuing rGS at this time. Just by using ML to accelerate initial genetic testing (without changing the tests ordered), the median time to first genetic test dropped from 10 days to 1 day, and the number of diagnostic odysseys resolved within 14 days of NICU admission increased by a factor of 1.8. By additionally requiring rGS at the time of positive ML prediction, the number of diagnostic odysseys resolved within 14 days was 3.8 times higher than the baseline.Conclusions ML predictions of genetic testing need, together with the application of the right rapid testing modality, can help providers accelerate genetics evaluation and bring about earlier and better outcomes for patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Grant Number UM1TR004548.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Abigail Wexner Research Institute IRB approved the study (STUDY00000276) with a waiver of informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.NICUNeonatal Intensive Care UnitNCHNationwide Children’s HospitalEHRElectronic Health RecordRDWResearch Data WarehouseDxDiagnosis (“received a Dx”) or Diagnostic (“Dx odyssey”)rGSrapid Genomic SequencingGSGenome SequencingESExome SequencingNGSNext Generation SequencingH&PHistory and Physical ExaminationGAGestational AgeBWBirth WeightHPOHuman Phenotype OntologyICInformation ContentIPRInformation Potential RatioMLMachine LearningCIConfidence IntervalSHAPSHapley Additive explanationROCReceiver Operator CharacteristicPRPrecision-RecallAUCArea Under the Curve