RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Identifying Homeless Population Needs in the Emergency Department Using Community-Based Participatory Research
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.23.20104463
DO 10.1101/2020.05.23.20104463
A1 Andrew Franco
A1 Jonathan Meldrum
A1 Christine Ngaruiya
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/26/2020.05.23.20104463.abstract
AB Background Annually 1.5 million Americans face housing insecurity, and compared to their domiciled counterparts are three times more likely to utilize the Emergency Department (ED). Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) methods have been employed in underserved populations, but use in the ED has been limited. We employed CBPR with a primary goal of improved linkage to care, reduced ED recidivism, and improved homeless health care.Methods A needs analysis was performed using semi-structured individual interviews with participants experiencing homelessness as well as with stakeholders. Results were analyzed using principles of grounded theory. At the end of the interviews, respondents were invited to join the “CBPR team”. At CBPR team meetings, results from interviews were expounded upon and discussions on intervention development were conducted.Results Twenty-five stakeholders were interviewed including people experiencing housing insecurity, ED staff, inpatient staff, and community shelters and services. Three themes emerged from the interviews. First, the homeless population lack access to basic needs, thus management of medical needs must be managed alongside social ones. Second, specific challenges to address homeless needs in the ED include episodic care, inability to recognize housing insecurity, timely involvement of ancillary staff, and provider attitudes towards homeless patients affecting quality of care. Lastly, improved discharge planning and communication with outside resources is essential to improving homeless health and decreasing ED overutilization. A limitation of results is bias towards social networks influencing included stakeholders.Conclusion CBPR is a promising approach to address gaps in homeless health care as it provides a comprehensive view incorporating various critical perspectives. Key ED-based interventions addressing recidivism include improved identification of housing insecurity, reinforced relationships between ED and community resources, and better discharge planning.Contribution to the LiteratureHomeless patients represent a significant portion of emergency department visits, but their health outcomes are worse and their unique health needs are often unmet. In this study, we utilized Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) to integrate a complex health system with its community partners in order to determine and prioritize those needs.CBPR has seen limited use with emergency department patients, and provides insight on the needs of marginalized populations.This paper presents a set of recommendations for improving homeless health in the emergency department and decreasing recidivism.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:A waiver was obtained through the Yale Institutional Review Board since the study objectives address quality improvement.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.