PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Yan, Youpei AU - Bayham, Jude AU - Fenichel, Eli P. TI - Do Face Masks Create a False Sense of Security? A COVID-19 Dilemma AID - 10.1101/2020.05.23.20111302 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.05.23.20111302 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/26/2020.05.23.20111302.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/26/2020.05.23.20111302.full AB - Face masks have become an emblem of the public response to COVID-19, with many governments mandating their use in public spaces. The logic is that face masks are low cost and might help prevent some transmission. However, from the start, the assumption that face masks are “low cost” was questioned. Early on, there were warnings of the opportunity cost of public use of medical masks given shortages of personal protective equipment for healthcare providers. This led to recommendations for cloth masks and other face coverings, with little evidence of their ability to prevent transmission. However, there may also be a high cost to these recommendations if people rely on face masks in place of other more effective ways to break transmission, such as staying home. We use SafeGraph smart device location data to show that the representative American in states that have face mask mandates spent 20-30 minutes less time at home, and increase visits to a number of commercial locations, following the mandate. Since the reproductive rate of SAR-COV2, the pathogen that causes COVID-19 is hovering right around one, such substitution behavior could be the difference between controlling the epidemic and a resurgence of cases.HighlightsWe use smart device location data to show the behavioral response to face mask mandates during the 2020 COVID-19 epidemic.We find face mask mandates lead people to spend 20-30 minutes less time at home per day.We find face mask mandates increase trip taking to a variety of locations, chief among them are restaurants.This substitution behavior is concerning given the limited information on the protective value of casual face coverings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementYY and EPF are supported by the Knobloch Family Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB not requiredAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData can be acquired easily from SafeGraph and other public sources.