PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Sumio Iwasaki AU - Shinichi Fujisawa AU - Sho Nakakubo AU - Keisuke Kamada AU - Yu Yamashita AU - Tatsuya Fukumoto AU - Kaori Sato AU - Satoshi Oguri AU - Keisuke Taki AU - Hajime Senjo AU - Junichi Sugita AU - Kasumi Hayasaka AU - Satoshi Konno AU - Mutsumi Nishida AU - Takanori Teshima TI - Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection in nasopharyngeal swab and saliva AID - 10.1101/2020.05.13.20100206 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.05.13.20100206 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/24/2020.05.13.20100206.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/24/2020.05.13.20100206.full AB - We prospectively compared the efficacy of PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 between paired nasopharyngeal and saliva samples in 76 patients including ten COVID-19 patients. The overall concordance rate of the virus detection between the two samples was 97.4% (95%CI, 90.8–99.7). Viral load was equivalent in COVID-19 patients, but the virus tended to disappear earlier in saliva at convalescent phase compared to nasopharyngeal samples. These results suggest that saliva is a reliable noninvasive alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs and facilitate widespread PCR testing in the face of shortages of swabs and protective equipment without posing a risk to healthcare workers.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Board.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available.