TY - JOUR T1 - Prevalence of facemask use among general public when visiting wet market during Covid-19 pandemic: An observational study JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.05.17.20105023 SP - 2020.05.17.20105023 AU - Gobi Hariyanayagam Gunasekaran AU - Sera Selvanthansundram Gunasekaran AU - Shargunan Selvanthan Gunasekaran AU - Nur Syafina Insyirah Binti Zaimi AU - Nor Amirah Binti Abdul Halim Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/21/2020.05.17.20105023.abstract N2 - Background In late December, 2019, an outbreak of a novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19; previously known as 2019-nCoV) was epidemiologically linked to a seafood and wet animal wholesale market, in Wuhan, Hubei, China. This have instigated stigma among general population as wet market is viewed as high risk location for getting infected with coronavirus.Objective This study investigated the prevalence of facemask use among general population visiting wet market. This study also investigated the demographic factors contributing to unacceptable facemask practice.Setting This prospective observational study was done among visitor to a district wet market selling range of live or freshly slaughtered animals during COVID-19 pandemic outbreak.Methods Individuals entering through dedicated entry point were observed for the type, category and practice of wearing personal protective equipment. Inclusion criteria for this study were any individual’s entering the wet market. Subjects were categorized into two groups of acceptable and unacceptable facemask practice. The Pearson chi-square was used to test for differences in investigated variables in the univariate setting and Binary Logistic regression model was used in the multivariate setting.Main outcome measure Prevalence, acceptance practice and odds ratio of unacceptance of facemask use.Results Among 1697 individuals included in the final analysis, 1687 (99.7%) was observed wearing facemask with 1338 (78.8%) using medical-grade facemask. Among them, 1615 (95.7%) individuals’ facemask practice was acceptable while the reaming 72 (4.3%) individuals was observed with unacceptable facemask practice. Individuals using medical grade facemask and high-risk age group are 6.4 times (OR=6.40; 95% CI, 2.00-20.43; p=. 002) and 2.06 times practice (OR=2.06; 95% CI, 1.08-3.94; p=.028). More likely to practice unacceptable facemask use respectively.Conclusion High saturation of facemask among general population is an adequate indicator of public hygiene measures strategy which can help to mitigate the COVID-19 epidemic impact. Alarmingly, the unacceptable facemask practice among high-risk population raises the need for a targeted approach by healthcare authorities to ensure satisfactory facemask use.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThe ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from the Medical Ethical Review Committee [KKM/NIHSEC/P20-1002(6)] Ministry of Health, Malaysia.Funding StatementThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request ER -