PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - David BT Robinson AU - Arfon GMT Powell AU - Jennifer Waterman AU - Luke Hopkins AU - Osian P James AU - Richard J Egan AU - Wyn G Lewis TI - Predictive value of Altmetric Score on prospective citation and bibliometric impact: rise of a new argot AID - 10.1101/2020.05.15.20102830 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.05.15.20102830 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/20/2020.05.15.20102830.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/20/2020.05.15.20102830.full AB - Background Bibliometric and Altmetric analyses provide important but alternative perspectives regarding research article impact. This study aimed to establish whether Altmetric Score (AS) was associated with citation rate, independent of bibliometrics.Method Citations for a previously reported cohort of 100 most cited articles associated with the keyword “Surgery” (2018, Powell et al), were collected and a three-year interval Citation Gain (iCG) evaluated. Previous citation count, Citation Rate Index (CRI), AS, five-year Impact Factor, and Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels were used to classify citation rate prospect.Results During follow-up, the median iCG was 161 (IQR 83–281), with 73 and 62 articles receiving an increase in CRI and AS, respectively. Median CRI and AS increase were 2.8 (−0.1–7.7) and 3 (0–4), respectively. Receiver-Operator-Characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that CRI (AUC 0.86 (95% CI 0.79–0.93), p<0.001) and AS (Area Under Curve (AUC) 0.65 (95% CI 0.55–0.76), p=0.008) were associated with higher iCG. AS critical threshold ≥ 2.0 was associated with better iCG when dichotomised at iCG median (OR=4.94, 95% CI 1.99–12.26, p=0.001) and iCG Upper Quartile (UQ, OR=4.13, 95% CI 1.60–10.66, p=0.003). Multivariable analysis identified that only CRI was independently associated with iCG when dichotomised at the median (OR 18.22, 95% CI 6.70–49.55, p<0.001) and UQ (OR 19.30, 95% CI 4.23–88.15, p<0.001).Conclusion Citation Rate Indices and Altmetric Scores are important predictors of interval Citation Gain, and better at predicting future citations than the historical and established Impact Factor and OCEBM quality of evidence descriptors.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementOP James was supported by a Joint Surgical Research Fellowship from the Royal College of Surgeons England and Health Education and Improvement WalesAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesIf raw data is required, requests can be made to the corresponding author.