RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Using the shock index to rule out stroke in patients with impaired consciousness in the emergency department: a single-center retrospective study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.16.20101204
DO 10.1101/2020.05.16.20101204
A1 Kosuke Kato
A1 Shogo Sagisaka
A1 Masayuki Ueda
A1 Hidetaka Tamune
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/20/2020.05.16.20101204.abstract
AB Background Stroke is a significant cause of impaired consciousness. During a stroke, intracranial pressure increases, resulting in hypertension and bradycardia, also known as the Cushing response. Previous studies showed that systolic blood pressure (sBP) was useful for diagnosing stroke. We hypothesized that stroke patients would show a low Shock Index (SI, pulse rate divided by sBP), and that a high SI would therefore be also useful for ruling out stroke in patients with impaired consciousness.Methods This was a single-centre retrospective medical record review conducted between 2015 and 2016. We identified 194 patients with stroke and 588 patients without stroke. We included all out-patients with impaired consciousness who underwent cranial computed tomography (CT) and allocated them to the stroke (cerebral infarction, intracerebral haemorrhage, and subarachnoid haemorrhage) and non-stroke groups. For both the sBP and SI, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of each cut-off value and compared their diagnostic value.Results The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.801 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.761–0.840) for the sBP and 0.764 (0.729–0.799) for the SI. For an sBP higher than 90 mmHg and an SI lower than 1, the sensitivity was 99.5% for both. The specificity was 10.9% and 15.1%, respectively, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.045 and 0.034, respectively. Subgroup analyses suggested that predictive value of SI was enough high regardless of the subtype of stroke, patient’s past history of hypertension, or level of consciousness.Conclusion SI may be useful for excluding stroke in patients with impaired consciousness. This study suggested that when the pulse rate exceeds sBP, stroke can be ruled out. In these cases, we suggest that physicians focus on non-neurological examinations and treatments rather than diagnostic examinations for stroke.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the paperAUCarea under the ROC curveCPSSCincinnati Prehospital Stroke ScaleDDxdifferential diagnosisPRpulse rate [/min]ROCreceiver operating characteristicSIshock indexsBPsystolic blood pressure [mmHg]