PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Vivek Shinde AU - Rongman Cai AU - Joyce Plested AU - Iksung Cho AU - Jamie Fiske AU - Xuan Pham AU - Mingzhu Zhu AU - Shane Cloney-Clark AU - Nan Wang AU - Haixia Zhou AU - Bin Zhou AU - Nita Patel AU - Michael J Massare AU - Amy Fix AU - Michelle Spindler AU - David Nigel Thomas AU - Gale Smith AU - Louis Fries AU - Gregory M Glenn TI - Induction of Cross-reactive Hemagglutination Inhibiting Antibody and Polyfunctional CD4+ T-cell Responses by a Recombinant Matrix-M-Adjuvanted Hemagglutinin Nanoparticle Influenza Vaccine AID - 10.1101/2020.05.11.20098574 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.05.11.20098574 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/18/2020.05.11.20098574.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/18/2020.05.11.20098574.full AB - Background Recurrent reports of suboptimal influenza vaccine effectiveness have renewed calls to develop improved, broadly cross-protective influenza vaccines. Here, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a novel, saponin (Matrix-M)-adjuvanted, recombinant hemagglutinin (HA) quadrivalent nanoparticle influenza vaccine (qNIV).Methods We conducted a randomized, observer-blind, comparator-controlled (trivalent high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine [IIV3-HD], or quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine [RIV4]), safety and immunogenicity trial of qNIV (in 5 different doses/formulations) in healthy adults aged ≥65 years. Vaccine immunogenicity was measured by hemagglutination-inhibition assays using reagents expressing wild-type HA sequences (wt-HAI) and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses.Results A total of 1375 participants were randomized, immunized, and followed for safety and immunogenicity. Matrix-M-adjuvanted qNIV induced superior wt-HAI antibody responses against 5 of 6 homologous or drifted strains evaluated compared to unadjuvanted qNIV. Adjuvanted qNIV induced post-vaccination wt-HAI antibody responses at Day 28 that were: statistically higher than IIV3-HD against a panel of homologous or drifted A/H3N2 strains; similar to IIV3-HD against homologous A/H1N1 and B (Victoria) strains; and similar to RIV4 against all homologous and drifted strains evaluated. The qNIV formulation with 75 μg Matrix-M adjuvant induced substantially higher post-vaccination geometric mean fold-increases of influenza HA-specific polyfunctional CD4+ T-cells compared to IIV3-HD or RIV4. Overall, similar frequencies of solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were reported in all treatment groups.Conclusions qNIV with 75 μg Matrix-M adjuvant was well tolerated and induced robust antibody and cellular responses, notably against both homologous and drifted A/H3N2 viruses. Further investigation in a pivotal phase 3 trial is underway.SHORT SUMMARY We compared multiple formulations of a recombinant Matrix-M-adjuvanted nanoparticle influenza vaccine to 2 licensed influenza vaccines in older adults. The nanoparticle vaccine was well tolerated, and induced hemagglutination-inhibition antibody and CD4+ T-cell responses to vaccine-homologous and drifted A/H3N2 influenza viruses.Competing Interest StatementVivek Shinde, Joyce Plested, Iksung Cho, Jamie Fiske, Mingzhu Zhu, Shane Cloney-Clark, Haixia Zhou, Bin Zhou, Nita Patel, Michael J Massare, Gale Smith, Louis Fries, and Gregory M Glenn are current employees of Novavax, Inc. Amy Fix, David Nigel Thomas, Michelle Spindler, Rongman Cai, Nan Wang, and Xuan Pham are former employees of Novavax, Inc.Clinical TrialNCT03658629Funding StatementThis work was supported by the sponsor, Novavax Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available as analyses are ongoing and will be used for regulatory submissions for the vaccine described; but may become available in the future from the corresponding author on reasonable request.