PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Amir Shamshirian
AU  - Amirhossein Hessami
AU  - Keyvan Heydari
AU  - Reza Alizadeh-Navaei
AU  - Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh
AU  - George W. Yip
AU  - Roya Ghasemian
AU  - Morteza Behnamfar
AU  - Hananeh Baradaran
AU  - Elham Aboufazeli
AU  - Hamed Jafarpour
AU  - Keyvan Karimifar
AU  - Aida Eftekhari
AU  - Danial Shamshirian
TI  - Hydroxychloroquine <em>Versus</em> COVID-19: A Periodic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AID  - 10.1101/2020.04.14.20065276
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.04.14.20065276
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/17/2020.04.14.20065276.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/17/2020.04.14.20065276.full
AB  - Importance This systematic review and meta-analysis not only indicated no clinical benefits regarding hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment with/without azithromycin for COVID-19 patients, but the higher mortality rate and frequency of known HCQ adverse effects were observed for the HCQ/HCQ+AZM regimen group.Objective To overcome the controversies regarding the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19 through meta-analysis.Data Sources A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar and medRxiv pre-print database using all available MeSH terms for COVID-19 and hydroxychloroquine up to May 14, 2020.Study Selection Studies focused on the effectiveness of HCQ with/without azithromycin (AZM) in confirmed COVID-19 patients were entered into the study including: comparative or non-comparative clinical studies including observational/interventional studies with retrospective/prospective nature with/without control group as well as Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs).Data Extraction and Synthesis Two researchers have independently evaluated quality assessment of the studies and abstracted data for data extraction, which has reviewed by the supervisor for accuracy. Extracted data were analyzed using CMA v. 2.2.064. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I-squared (I2) test, and fixed/random-effects model was used when appropriate for pooling of studies.Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) 1) Clinical effectiveness of HCQ with/without AZM in the treatment of COVID-19; 2) Mortality rate; 3) Disease exacerbation; 4) Frequency of known HCQ adverse effects occurred during treatment; 5) Intubation need; 6) Radiological improvement.Results Out of 21 studies entered into our systematic review, 18 studies including 11 comparative studies with control group and seven observational studies containing 5,561 participants have entered into the study. The results of the meta-analysis on comparative studies indicated no significant clinical effectiveness (negative in RT-PCR evaluation) for HCQ regimen in the treatment of COVID-19 in comparison to control group (RR: 0.96, 95% CI, 0.76-1.22). The same result was observed for the combination of HCQ+azithromycin (RR: 2.15, 95% CI, 0.31-14.77). Approximately 1.5 times higher mortality rate was observed among the HCQ regimen group (RR: 1.54, 95% CI, 1.04-2.29) and 3.5 times higher in HCQ+AZM (RR: 3.65, 95% CI, 1.10-12.10) group in comparison to control group, which was affected by age differences according to meta-regression analysis (P=0.0003). No substantial difference was observed for disease exacerbation (RR: 1.60, 95% CI, 0.54-4.71) between HCQ group and controls. Also, radiological findings significantly improved in the HCQ group (OR: 0.32, 95% CI, 0.11-0.98). Odds of known HCQ adverse effects (diarrhea, vomiting, blurred vision, rash, headache, etc.) occurred in the HCQ regimen group was approximately 3.5 times of control group (OR: 3.55, 95% CI, 1.61-7.82), but no substantial differences were found regarding intubation odds between HCQ group and control group (OR: 2.11, 95% CI, 0.31-14.03).Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and meta-analysis not only showed no clinical benefits regarding HCQ treatment with/without azithromycin for COVID-19 patients, but according to multiple sensitivity analysis, the higher mortality rates were observed for both HCQ and HCQ+AZM regimen groups, especially in the latter. Also, frequency of adverse effects was higher in HCQ regimen group. However, due to that most of the studies were non-randomized and results were not homogenous, selection bias was unavoidable and further large randomized clinical trials following comprehensive meta-analysis should be taken into account in order to achieve more reliable findings.Question Is hydroxychloroquine effective and safe against COVID-19?!Findings This systematic review and meta-analysis on 18 studies including 5,561 participants indicated no significant clinical effectiveness for hydroxychloroquine with/without azithromycin against COVID-19 patients. Also, the higher mortality rate and adverse effects were observed in the HCQ/HCQ+AZM regimen group.Meaning It seems that hydroxychloroquine does not works as expected and attracted attentions as a potential agent against COVID-19, so, we should be cautious about the treatment decision.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available in data bases mentioned in the search strategy.