TY - JOUR T1 - Differential effects of socio-demographic factors on maternal haemoglobin concentration in three sub-Saharan African Countries JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.05.06.20082941 SP - 2020.05.06.20082941 AU - Dickson A. Amugsi AU - Zacharie T. Dimbuene AU - Catherine Kyobutungi Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/13/2020.05.06.20082941.abstract N2 - Objective To investigate the effects of socio-demographic factors on maternal haemoglobin (Hb) at different points of the conditional distribution of Hb concentration.Methods We analysed the Demographic and Health Surveys data from Ghana, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Mozambique, using Hb concentration of women aged 15-49 years as an outcome of interest. We utilise quantile regression to estimate the effects of the putative socio-demographic factors across specific points of the maternal Hb concentration.Results We observed crucial differences in the effects of socio-demographic factors along the conditional distribution of Hb concentration. In Ghana, years of schooling had a positive effect on Hb concentration of mothers in the 5th and 10th quantiles. A year increase in schooling was associated with a unit increase in Hb concentration across all quantiles in Mozambique, with the largest effect at the lowest quantile. In contrast, a year increase in maternal education was associated with a unit decrease in Hb concentration of mothers in the three upper quantiles in DRC. Maternal body mass index had a positive effect on Hb of mothers in the 5th, 10th, 50th and 90th, and 5th to 50th quantiles in Ghana and Mozambique, respectively. Breastfeeding had a significant positive effect on maternal Hb concentration across all countries, with the largest effect occurring at the lower quantiles. All the household wealth indices had positive effects on Hb concentration across quantiles in Mozambique, with the largest effect among mothers in the upper quantiles. However, in Ghana, living in a poor wealth index was inversely related to Hb concentration of mothers in the 5th and 10th quantiles.Conclusions Our results showed that the effects of socio-demographic factors on maternal Hb concentration vary along its distribution. Interventions to address maternal anaemia should take these variations into account to identify the most vulnerable groups.What is already known?Higher years of formal education consistently predict positive maternal Hb outcomes in OLS and logistic regression analysis.Low maternal BMI, parity, living in poorest wealth quintile and breastfeeding are inversely related to maternal Hb concentration.Evidence from logistic regression analysis suggests that mothers who live in better-off households tend to have a better Hb concentration.What are the new findings?Socio-demographic factors have differential effects on Hb concentration at different points of its distribution.Interpreting results based on the mean effect (as in OLS) does not provide a comprehensive picture of the effects of the predictor variables.Breastfeeding has a positive effect on maternal Hb concentration contrary to the existing literatureContrary to the existing literature, maternal education is negatively associated with Hb of mothers in the three upper quantiles in DRC.What do the new findings imply?Differential effects of socio-demographic factors on Hb concentration may help identify suitable interventions for groups most in need.The QR analysis suggests the need to look beyond OLS findings when designing interventions to improve maternal Hb concentration.Promoting breastfeeding among mothers may potentially improve their Hb concentration.The negative effect of maternal education on Hb in DRC, suggests that educational interventions to improve health outcomes should be context-specificCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive funding from any source. Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis study was a re-analysis of existing data that are publicly available from The DHS Program at http://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-fr221-dhs-final-reports.cfm. Data are accessible free of charge upon registration with the Demographic and Health Survey program (The DHS Program). The registration is done on the DHS website indicated above. ER -