RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Planning phase-2 for the endoscopic units in Northern Italy after COVID-19 lockdown: an exit strategy with a lot of critical issues and a few opportunities
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.12.20092270
DO 10.1101/2020.05.12.20092270
A1 Gianpiero Manes
A1 Alessandro Repici
A1 Franco Radaelli
A1 Simone Saibeni
A1 Cristina Bezzio
A1 Matteo Colombo
A1 Fabio Pace
A1 on behalf of The ITALIAN GI-COVID19 Working Group
A1 Mario Schettino
A1 Massimo Devani
A1 Paolo Andreozzi
A1 Lucienne Pellegrini
A1 Desirè Picascia
A1 Arnaldo Amato
A1 Costanza Alvisi
A1 Giovanni Aragona
A1 Elia Armellini
A1 Mohammad Ayoubi
A1 Stefano Bargiggia
A1 Stefano Benvenuti
A1 Paolo Beretta
A1 Paola Boarino
A1 Andrea Buda
A1 Lorenzo Camellini
A1 Sergi Cavenati
A1 Vincenzo Cennamo
A1 Fabrizio Cereatti
A1 Claudio de Angelis
A1 Giovanni de Pretis
A1 Giuseppe De Roberto
A1 Marco Dinelli
A1 Giulio Donato
A1 Carlo Fabbri
A1 Luca Ferraris
A1 Alessandro Fugazza
A1 Pietro Fusaroli
A1 Nicola Gaffuri
A1 Salvatore Greco
A1 Piera Leoni
A1 Gianluigi Longobardi
A1 Benedetto Mangiavillano
A1 Mauro Manno
A1 Alberto Merighi
A1 Guido Missale
A1 Alessandro Mussetto
A1 Massimiliano Mutignani
A1 Pietro Occhipinti
A1 Roberto Penagini
A1 Raffaele Salerno
A1 Romano Sassatelli
A1 Sergio Segato
A1 Sandro Sferrazza
A1 Teresa Staiano
A1 Alberto Tringali
A1 Giovanna Venezia
A1 Carlo Verna
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/13/2020.05.12.20092270.abstract
AB Background and aims Restarting activity in Endoscopic Departments (ED) after COVID-19 lockdown raises critical issues. This survey investigates strategies and uncertainties on resumption of elective activity.Methods Directors of 55 EDs in Northern Italy received a questionnaire focusing on the impact of pandemic on activity and organization and on the resources available at re-opening. A section was devoted to gather forecasts and proposals on the return path to normality.Results All centres had reduced their activities of at least 50% of the pre-COVID-19 period. A rate of endoscopists (13.6%), nurses (25.2%), and health assistants (14%) were not available since infected, or relocated to other departments. One third of endoscopic rooms were converted to COVID-19 care. Two third had the waiting or the recovery areas too small for distancing. A dedicated pathway for infected patients could not be guaranteed in 20% of EDs. Only one third of EDs judged realistic to completely restore a pre-crisis workload by the next months. Optimizing appropriateness of procedures, closer interaction with GPs and triaging patients with telemedicine were the proposals to re-open EDs.Conclusions The critical issues while re-opening EDs calls for reducing the workload in the endoscopy units through appropriate rescheduling of procedures.Funding NoneCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNot need registrationFunding StatementNo fundingAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesI hereby confirm that all data referred to in the mauscript are available