PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Pulijala Sathwika AU - Rampalli Viswa Chandra TI - Marginal Bone Loss and Aesthetics Around Zirconia and Titanium Dental Implants-A Metanalysis AID - 10.1101/2020.05.09.20096271 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.05.09.20096271 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/13/2020.05.09.20096271.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/13/2020.05.09.20096271.full AB - AIM To evaluate and compare the marginal bone loss and aesthetic outcomes of zirconia implants with titanium implants in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).MATERIAL AND METHODS Electronic [PubMed] and hand searches were performed to identify randomized controlled trials that were published between January 2008 to April 2020 which investigated and compared various outcomes between zirconia and titanium dental implants. Outcomes included assessment of marginal bone loss and aesthetics using spectrophotometric measurements. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the above parameters among various studies.RESULTS A total of 58 articles were screened for titles and abstracts. Subsequently 8 articles were selected for data extraction and evaluation. Zirconia implants were investigated and compared to titanium implants for marginal bone loss [MBL]. Customized zirconia and titanium abutments seated over implants were analyzed for aesthetic outcomes using spectrophotometric method using CIE-Lab measurements. Meta-analysis estimated that zirconia implants exhibited marginal bone loss reduction of 0.179mm (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.33) and −0.242mm (95% CI, −4.026 to 3.542) in aesthetic measurements than titanium implants.CONCLUSIONS No heterogeneity was observed among studies analyzed for marginal bone loss and significant differences were noticed between two groups. Noticeable heterogeneity was observed among studies assessing aesthetics using spectrophotometry and CIE-Lab measurements and results revealed no many significant differences between the two groups.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialAs the study is a metanalysis of previous trials, it was not submitted to a trial registry.Funding StatementThe authors funded the study themselves and report no conflicts of interest.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors will share datasets via public repository if needed.