PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Gustavo Arruda Viani
AU  - Juliana Fernandes Pavoni
AU  - Ligia Issa De Fendi
TI  - Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) in patients with ventricular tachycardia: a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes
AID  - 10.1101/2020.05.09.20094763
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.05.09.20094763
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/13/2020.05.09.20094763.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/13/2020.05.09.20094763.full
AB  - Objectives The effectiveness and safety of STAR in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) to catheter ablation are limited to small series. We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies to summarize existing data about efficacy and toxicity following START for VT. Methods: Eligible studies were identified on Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the proceedings of annual meetings through March 2020. We followed the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. An estimative of % VT burden reduction at 6 months higher than 85% was considered effective. A rate of any grade 3 or higher toxicity lower than 10% and no grade 4 or 5 were considered safe. Results: Four observational studies with a total of 39 patients treated were included. The % of VT burden reduction at 6 months was 91% (CI95% 83 - 10%). The consumption of lower than 2 anti-arrhythmia drugs (AAD) at 6 months was 81%. The ejection fraction improved in 12.8%, unchanged 82%, and decreased by 5.2%. The overall survival (OS) was 92% and 82 % in 6 and 12 months. The cardiac death and disease-specific survival at 12 months were 12% and 88.5%. Late grade 3 toxicity 5% with no grade 4-5. Conclusion: STAR produced satisfactory % of VT burden reduction, with a significant reduction in the consumption of AAD at 6 months, and no severe toxicity. These findings support the continued work to develop new trials and to adopt STAR as a treatment option for medical practice.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo fundingAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data referred to in our manuscript are collected from published studies and all of them are available on the electronic database.