RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF VISUAL FUNCTION FOR YOUNG AND MEDICALLY COMPLEX CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL VISUAL IMPAIRMENT: DEVELOPMENT AND INTER-RATER RELIABILITY
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.05.07.24306570
DO 10.1101/2024.05.07.24306570
A1 Weden, Kathleen M.
A1 Barstow, Elizabeth A.
A1 Oster, Robert A.
A1 DeCarlo, Dawn K.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/09/2024.05.07.24306570.abstract
AB Background Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVI) is the most common cause of low vision in children. Standardized, quantifiable measures of visual function are needed.Objective This study developed and evaluated a new method for quantifying visual function in young and medically complex children with CVI using remote videoconferencing.Methods Children diagnosed with CVI who had been unable to complete clinic-based recognition acuity tests were recruited from a low-vision rehabilitation clinic(n=22)Video-based Visual Function Assessment (VFA) was implemented using videoconference technology. Three low-vision rehabilitation clinicians independently scored recordings of each child’s VFA. Interclass correlations for inter-rater reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlations (ICC). Correlations were estimated between the video-based VFA scores and both clinically obtained acuity measures and children’s cognitive age equivalence.Results Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlations (ICC). Correlations were estimated between the VFA scores, clinically obtained acuity measures, and cognitive age equivalence. ICCs showed good agreement (ICC and 95% CI 0.835 (0.701-0.916)) on VFA scores across raters and agreement was comparable to that from previous, similar studies. VFA scores strongly correlated (r= -0.706, p=0.002) with clinically obtained acuity measures. VFA scores and the cognitive age equivalence were moderately correlated (r= 0.518, p=0.005), with notable variation in VFA scores for participants below a ten month cognitive age-equivalence. The variability in VFA scores among children with lowest cognitive age-equivalence may have been an artifact of the study’s scoring method, or may represent existent variability in visual function for children with the lowest cognitive age-equivalence.Conclusions Our new VFA is a reliable, quantitative measure of visual function for young and medically complex children with CVI. Future study of the VFA intrarater reliability and validity is warranted.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the EyeSight Foundation of Alabama, Alie B. Gorrie Low Vision Research Fund and Research to Prevent Blindness. Additional support came from the National Institutes of Health [UL1 TR003096 to R.O.] and Grant T32 HS013852.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of the University of Alabama at Birmingham gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors