RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Clinical and behavioural characteristics of self-isolating healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a single-centre observational study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.07.20094177
DO 10.1101/2020.05.07.20094177
A1 de Wilton, Angus
A1 Kilich, Eliz
A1 Chaudhry, Zain
A1 Bell, Lucy CK
A1 Gahir, Joshuat
A1 Cadman, Jane
A1 Lever, Robert A
A1 Logan, Sarah
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/11/2020.05.07.20094177.abstract
AB Objectives To describe a cohort of self-isolating healthcare workers (HCWs) with presumed COVID-19.Design A cross-sectional, single-centre study.Setting A large, teaching hospital based in Central London with tertiary infection services.Participants 236 HCWs completed a survey distributed by internal staff email bulletin. 167 were female and 65Measures Information on symptomatology, exposures and health-seeking behaviour were collected from participants by self-report.Results The 236 respondents reported illness compatible with COVID-19 and there was an increase in illness reporting during March 2020. Diagnostic swabs were not routinely performed.. Cough (n=179, 75.8%), fever (n=138, 58.5%), breathlessness (n=84, 35.6%) were reported. Anosmia was reported in 42.2%. Fever generally settled within 1 week (n=110, 88%). Several respondents remained at home and did not seek formal medical attention despite reporting severe breathlessness and measuring hypoxia (n=5/9, 55.6%). 2 patients required hospital admission but recovered following oxygen therapy. 84 respondents (41.2%) required greater than the obligated 7 days off work and 9 required greater than 3 weeks off.Conclusion There was a significant increase in staff reporting illness compatible with possible COVID-19 during March 2020. Conclusions cannot be drawn about exact numbers of confirmed cases due to lack of diagnostic swabbing. There were significant numbers of respondents reporting anosmia; as well as early non-specific illness prior to onset of cough and fever. This may represent pre-symptomatic HCWs who are likely to be infectious and thus criteria for isolation and swabbing should be broadened. The study also revealed concerning lack of healthcare seeking in respondents with significant red flag symptoms (severe breathlessness, hypoxia). This should be addressed urgently to reduce risk of severe disease being detected late. Finally, this study should inform trusts that HCWs may require longer than 7 days off work to recover from illness.Strengths and limitations of this studyTo the authors’ knowledge, this study presents one of the first descriptive data analysis of self-reported healthcare worker (HCW) COVID-19 exposures and symptomatology in the UK.Study respondents represented a broad range of job roles, including both frontline clinical and non-patient facing staff.The inclusion of questions focusing on health-seeking behaviour allows results to be used to inform human resource management in the developing pandemic, and provides concerning but important data around late healthcare seeking in HCWsData were self-reported, cross-sectional and retrospective, which may be subject to recall bias, and the lack of diagnostic swabbing in the majority of respondents limits interpretation of the dataFull demographic data were not collected on participants and certain staff groups may have been over-represented in the sample, which may introduce sampling bias.Competing Interest StatementDr Eliz Kilich was employed in 2018-2019 by the London School of Hygiene of Tropical Medicine undertaking research on attitudes toward maternal vaccination. This research was funded by a grant from GlaxoSmithKline (commercial funder) to support research on maternal vaccination. All other authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Funding StatementNo external funding was receivedAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData available on reasonable request to angus.dewilton{at}nhs.net responses will be within 28 days