PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Elliott, Meghan J. AU - Fiest, Kirsten M. AU - Love, Shannan AU - Birdsell, Dale AU - Loth, Maureena AU - Dumka, Heather AU - Rana, Benny AU - Shommu, Nusrat AU - Benterud, Eleanor AU - Gil, Sarah AU - Acharya, Dilaram AU - Harrison, Tyrone G. AU - Pannu, Neesh AU - James, Matthew T. TI - Patient preferences and priorities for the design of an acute kidney injury prevention trial: Findings from a consensus workshop AID - 10.1101/2024.03.04.24303721 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.03.04.24303721 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/18/2024.03.04.24303721.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/18/2024.03.04.24303721.full AB - Introduction High-quality clinical trials are needed to establish the safety, efficacy, and real-world use of potential therapies for acute kidney injury (AKI) prevention. In this consensus workshop, we identified patient and caregiver priorities for recruitment, intervention delivery, and outcomes of a clinical trial of cilastatin to prevent nephrotoxic AKI.Methods We included adults with lived experience of AKI, chronic kidney disease, or risk factors for AKI (e.g., critical care hospitalization), and their caregivers. Using a modified nominal group technique approach, we conducted a series of hybrid in-person/virtual discussions covering 3 clinical trial topic areas: (1) consent and recruitment; (2) intervention delivery; and (3) trial outcomes. Participants voted on their top preferences in each topic area, and discussion transcripts were analyzed inductively using conventional content analysis.Results Thirteen individuals (11 patients, 2 caregivers) participated in the workshop. For consent and recruitment, participants prioritized technology enabled pre-screening and involvement of family members in the consent process. For intervention delivery, participants prioritized measures to facilitate intervention administration and return visits. For trial outcomes, participants identified kidney-related and other clinical outcomes (e.g., AKI, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular events) as top priorities. Analysis of transcripts provided insight into care team and family involvement in trial-related decisions, implications of allocation to a placebo arm, and impact of participants’ experiences of AKI and critical illness.Conclusion Findings from our workshop will directly inform development of a clinical trial protocol of cilastatin for nephrotoxic AKI prevention and can assist others in patient-centered approaches to AKI trial design.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Team Grant : Intervention Trial in Inflammation for Chronic Conditions - Evidence to Impact; Funding Reference Number LI3 189373.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board of the University of Calgary give ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.