RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Level of clinical competence in junior medical residents and its correlation with antibiotic prescription errors: a cross-sectional study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.28.20083584
DO 10.1101/2020.04.28.20083584
A1 Martínez D. Joshua
A1 Sierra-Martínez Octavio
A1 Galindo-Fraga Arturo
A1 Trejo Mejía Juan Andrés
A1 Sánchez-Mendiola Melchor
A1 Ochoa-Hein Eric
A1 Vázquez-Rivera Mirella
A1 Gutiérrez-Cirlos Carlos
A1 Naveja Jesús
A1 Martínez-González Adrián
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/05/2020.04.28.20083584.abstract
AB Background A large portion of prescribing errors can be attributed to medication knowledge deficiency. They are preventable and most often occur in the stage of ordering. Antimicrobials are the drug class most commonly related to prescribing errors.Objectives The study main objective was to describe the relationship between clinical competence and antibiotic prescription errors. Secondary objectives were to measure clinical competence of junior medical residents with an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), to describe the frequency and severity of antibiotic prescription errors and to find items and attributes of clinical competence that are correlated with the antibiotic prescription error ratio.Methods A cross-sectional study was designed to assess the clinical competence of junior medical residents, from National Institute of Pediatrics and “Manuel Gea Gonzalez” General Hospital in Mexico City, through an infectious disease OSCE and measure the frequency and severity of antibiotic prescription errors. Statistical analysis included generalizability theory and internal consistency Cronbach’s alpha, a partial correlation controlling sex and time of degree, simple linear regression and item’s exploratory factorial analysis.Results The mean OSCE score was 0.692 ± 0.073. The inter-item Cronbach’s alpha was 0.927 and inter-station Cronbach’s alpha was 0.774. The G coefficient in generalizability theory analysis was 0.84. The antibiotic prescription error ratio was 45.1% ± 7%. The severity of antibiotic prescription errors was: category C (errors that do not cause patient harm) = 56 cases, 15.5%; category D (monitoring required to confirm that errors resulted in no harm to the patient or intervention required to preclude harm) = 51 cases, 14.1%; category E (errors that may contribute to or result in temporary harm to the patient and require intervention) = 235, 65.2%; category F (errors that may contribute to or resulted in temporary harm to the patient and require initial or prolonged hospitalization) = 18 cases, 5%. The correlation between clinical competence and antibiotic prescription errors was established with Pearson correlation (r=-0.33, p<0.05, CI95% -0.57 to -0.07), and partial correlation controlling effect of gender and time since graduation (r=-0.39, p<0.01, CI95% -0.625 to -0.118).Conclusions We found a negative correlation between clinical competence and antibiotic prescription error ratio in graduated physicians who have been accepted in a medical specialty. The therapeutic plan, which is a component of clinical competence score, and the prescription skills had a negative correlation with antibiotic prescription errors. The most frequent mistakes in antibiotic prescriptions errors would need a second intervention.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis study is a cross-sectional study and is not a clinical trialFunding StatementThis study was funded by the Coordination of Educational Development and Curricular Innovation (CODEIC) of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). Acknowledgments All authors approved the submitted version. All the authors would like to thank the staff of the Medical Education Department, Nacional Institute of Pediatrics and “Manuel Gea González” General Hospital for their support. Joshua Martínez-Domínguez is enrolled at the PECEM program of the Faculty of Medicine at UNAM and is supported by CONACyT.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data of our study is not available yet