RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Are current guidelines overcautious regarding refeeding of patients with severe anorexia nervosa: a retrospective cohort study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.26.20050799
DO 10.1101/2020.04.26.20050799
A1 Ciobanasu, Oana
A1 Seth, Bhavisha
A1 Terekh, Iryna
A1 Bruno, Alessandro
A1 Ayton, Agnes
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/01/2020.04.26.20050799.abstract
AB Weight restoration is an integral part of managing anorexia nervosa patients and has been found to be associated with electrolyte and fluid abnormalities gathered under the umbrella term refeeding syndrome, which has led to cautious initiation of caloric regimes. This study looks at how a sample of severe anorexia nervosa patients were managed using higher rates of refeeding than the ones currently recommended.Design retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with severe eating disorders admitted to an UK specialist tertiary centre. The treatment programme uses a weight restoration regime starting at 1000 kcal/day, increased to 1500 kcal/day after two days and to 2000 kcal/day after seven days. The main outcome was the rate of hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia within the first two weeks of weight restoration. The secondary outcomes included rate of weight gain and tendency of electrolyte shift.Results 83% of the patient sample were categorised as extreme anorexia nervosa (BMI <15). 11.3% of patients developed hypophosphatemia, 11.3% had hypomagnesemia, 42% had hypokalaemia. The lowest levels were found between the 5-6 days after starting refeeding. The vast majority of electrolyte abnormalities fell into the mild category. Electrolyte abnormalities were easily corrected by oral supplementation, and only 5% required iv replacement. The only significant predictor for hypophosphatemia was a BMI below 13.Conclusions The majority of extremely ill patients with anorexia nervosa tolerate refeeding starting at 25-30kcal/kg. Oral supplementation is effective, so overcautious refeeding is unnecessary, provided that the patient is carefully monitored.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding received by the authors for this project.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesPertinent clinical data is included in the body of the paper, further anonymized study data can be provided upon request.