RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Estimation of SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rate by real-time antibody screening of blood donors JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.04.24.20075291 DO 10.1101/2020.04.24.20075291 A1 Erikstrup, Christian A1 Hother, Christoffer Egeberg A1 Vestager Pedersen, Ole Birger A1 Mølbak, Kåre A1 Skov, Robert Leo A1 Holm, Dorte Kinggaard A1 Sækmose, Susanne A1 Nilsson, Anna Christine A1 Brooks, Patrick Terrence A1 Kjærgaard Boldsen, Jens A1 Mikkelsen, Christina A1 Gybel-Brask, Mikkel A1 Sørensen, Erik A1 Dinh, Khoa Manh A1 Mikkelsen, Susan A1 Møller, Bjarne Kuno A1 Haunstrup, Thure A1 Harritshøj, Lene A1 Jensen, Bitten Aagaard A1 Hjalgrim, Henrik A1 Lillevang, Søren Thue A1 Ullum, Henrik YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/28/2020.04.24.20075291.abstract AB Background The pandemic due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has tremendous consequences for our societies. Knowledge of the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 is needed to accurately monitor the spread of the epidemic and also to calculate the infection fatality rate (IFR). These measures may help the authorities to make informed decisions and adjust the current societal interventions. Blood donors comprise approximately 4.7% of the similarly aged population of Denmark and blood is donated in all areas of the country. The objective of this study was to perform real-time seroprevalence surveying among blood donors as a tool to estimate previous SARS-CoV-2 infections and the population based IFR.Methods All Danish blood donors aged 17-69 years giving blood April 6 to 17 were tested for SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin M and G antibodies using a commercial lateral flow test. Antibody status was compared between areas and an estimate of the IFR was calculated. The seroprevalence was adjusted for assay sensitivity and specificity taking the uncertainties of the test validation into account when reporting the 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results The first 9,496 blood donors were tested and a combined adjusted seroprevalence of 1.7% (CI: 0.9-2.3) was calculated. The seroprevalence differed across areas. Using available data on fatalities and population numbers a combined IFR in patients younger than 70 is estimated at 82 per 100,000 (CI: 59-154) infections.Conclusions The IFR was estimated to be slightly lower than previously reported from other countries not using seroprevalence data. The IFR, including only individuals with no comorbidity, is likely several fold lower than the current estimate. This may have implications for risk mitigation. We have initiated real-time nationwide anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence surveying of blood donations as a tool in monitoring the epidemic.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols http://www.bloddonor.dk/antisarscov2 Funding StatementThe project was performed in kind of the participating institutions.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAggregated data are available. Please see provided URL.