RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A national landscaping survey of critical care services in hospitals accredited for training in a lower-middle income country: Pakistan
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.22.20071555
DO 10.1101/2020.04.22.20071555
A1 Madiha Hashmi
A1 Arshad Taqi
A1 Muhammad Iqbal Memon
A1 Syed Muneeb Ali
A1 Saleh Khaskheli
A1 Muhammad Sheharyar
A1 Muhammad Hayat
A1 Mohiuddin Shiekh
A1 Chamira Kodippily
A1 Dilanthi Gamage
A1 Arjen M Dondorp
A1 Rashan Haniffa
A1 Abi Beane
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/27/2020.04.22.20071555.abstract
AB Purpose To describe the extent and variation of critical care services in PakistanMaterials and methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in all CCUs recognised for postgraduate training to determine administration, infrastructure, equipment, staffing, and training.Results There were 220 CCUs registered for training, providing 2166 CCU beds and 1473 ventilators. Regional distribution of CCU beds per 100,000 population ranged from 1.0 in Sindh to none in Gilgit Baltistan (median 0.7). A senior clinician trained in critical care was available in 19 (12.1%) of units, giving a ratio of one trained intensivist for every 82 CCU beds and 0.009 trained intensivists per 100,000 population. One to one nurse to bed ratio during the day was available in 84 (53.5%) of units, dropping to 75 (47.8%) at night. Availability of 1:1 nursing also varied between provinces, ranging from 56.5% in Punjab compared to 0% in Azad Jamu Kashmir. All CCUs had basic infrastructure (electricity, running water, piped oxygen) and basic equipment (electronic monitoring and infusion pumps).Conclusion Pakistan, a lower middle-income country has an established network of critical care facilities with access to basic equipment, but inequalities in its distribution. Investment in critical care training for doctors and nurses is needed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis survey was supported by the Network for Improving Critical care Systems and Training (NICST), and a Wellcome funded innovations in Technology Partnership Award (Ref. WT-iTP-2018/002).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is not available on request.