RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 CT in relation to RT-PCR in diagnosing COVID-19 in the Netherlands: a prospective study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.22.20070441
DO 10.1101/2020.04.22.20070441
A1 Hester A Gietema
A1 Noortje Zelis
A1 J Martijn Nobel
A1 Lars JG Lambriks
A1 Lieke B van Alphen
A1 Astrid ML Oude Lashof
A1 Joachim E Wildberger
A1 Irene C Nelissen
A1 Patricia M Stassen
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/24/2020.04.22.20070441.abstract
AB Introduction Early differentiation between emergency department (ED) patients with and without corona virus disease (COVID-19) is very important. Chest CT scan may be helpful in early diagnosing of COVID-19. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of CT using RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 as reference standard and investigated reasons for discordant results between the two tests.Methods In this prospective single centre study in the Netherlands, all adult symptomatic ED patients had both a CT scan and a PCR upon arrival at the ED. CT results were compared with PCR test(s). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated. Discordant results were investigated using discharge diagnoses.Results Between March 13th and March 24th 2020, 193 symptomatic ED patients were included. In total, 43.0% of patients had a positive PCR and 56.5% a positive CT, resulting in a sensitivity of 89.2%, specificity 68.2%, likelihoodratio (LR) + 2.81 and LR-0.16. Sensitivity was higher in patients with high risk pneumonia (CURB-65 score ≥3; n=17, 100%) and with sepsis (SOFA score ≥2; n=137, 95.5%).Of the 35 patients (31.8%) with a suspicious CT and a negative PCR, 9 had another respiratory viral pathogen, and in 7 patients, COVID-19 was considered likely. One of nine patients with a non-suspicious CT and a positive PCR had developed symptoms within 48 hours before scanning.Discussion The accuracy of chest CT in symptomatic ED patients is high, but used as a single diagnostic test, CT can not safely diagnose or exclude COVID-19. However, CT can be used as a quick first screening tool.Key messagesWhat is the key question?We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of the chest CT scan using the PCR test for diagnosing COVID-19 as reference.What is the bottom line?Sensitivity of chest CT is high, especially in severely ill patients, but with moderate specificity, which could in part be explained by other respiratory viruses and false negative PCR tests.Why read on?Early differentation between patients with and without COVID-19 is extremely important, and CT scan should be considered a quick screening test, and may help to overcome suboptimal sensitivity of PCR tests.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis is not a clinical trial.Funding Statementno funding applicableAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available