TY - JOUR T1 - Persistent viral shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in faeces - a rapid review JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.04.17.20069526 SP - 2020.04.17.20069526 AU - S Gupta AU - J Parker AU - S Smits AU - J Underwood AU - S Dolwani Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/24/2020.04.17.20069526.abstract N2 - Aim In addition to respiratory symptoms, patients with COVID-19 can present with gastrointestinal complaints suggesting a possible faeco-oral transmission route. The primary aim of this review is to establish the incidence and timing of positive faecal samples for the SARS-CoV-2 virus in patients with COVID-19.Methods A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies describing COVID-19 patients tested for the virus in their stool. Data were extracted concerning the nature of the test, number and timing of positive samples, incidence of positive faecal tests after negative nasopharyngeal swabs and any evidence of viable faecal virus or faeco-oral transmission of the virus.Results There were 26 relevant articles identified. Combining these results demonstrated that 53ยท9% of those tested for faecal RNA in these studies were positive. Duration of faecal viral shedding ranged from 1 to 33 days after nasopharyngeal swab turned negative with one result remaining positive after 47 days of onset of symptoms. There was insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions about the proportion of cases potentially transmitted through infection via faecally shed virus.Conclusion There is a relatively high rate of positive tests and persistence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in faecal samples of selected patients with COVID-19. Further research is needed to demonstrate how much these positive tests correlate with viable virus and transmission through the faeco-oral route. This may have important implications for duration of isolation, precautions recommended in individuals undertaking a period of isolation, protective equipment for health professionals and interventional procedures involving the gastrointestinal tract.What does this paper add to the existing literature?We synthesise all available evidence from multiple sources and clarify the uncertainty around faecal shedding of SARS-CoV-2 virus, its persistence and duration from onset of symptoms, and after negative nasopharyngeal swabs. Evidence for faeco-oral transmission is plausible and demonstrated in one study though its relative contribution to transmission remains unclear.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementS Gupta is funded by the Wales Cancer Research Centre and Cardiff University J Parker is funded by a Royal College of Surgeons of England Research Fellowship S Smits is funded by Health and Care Research Wales health fellowship (ref HF-17-1352) J Underwood is funded by Medical Research Council (Grant Ref: MR/T023791/1) S Dolwani is Chief Investigator of the CONSCOP2 study funded by the NIHR (HTA Project: NIHR127914) There was no payment or services received from a third party by any of the authors or institutions for any aspect of the submitted work.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis is a systematic review and all the data analyzed was from the studies included in the review which have been cited in the manuscript. ER -