RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A Chronological and Geographical Analysis of Personal Reports of COVID-19 on Twitter
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.19.20069948
DO 10.1101/2020.04.19.20069948
A1 Ari Z. Klein
A1 Arjun Magge
A1 Karen O’Connor
A1 Haitao Cai
A1 Davy Weissenbacher
A1 Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/24/2020.04.19.20069948.abstract
AB The rapidly evolving outbreak of COVID-19 presents challenges for actively monitoring its spread. In this study, we assessed a social media mining approach for automatically analyzing the chronological and geographical distribution of users in the United States reporting personal information related to COVID-19 on Twitter. The results suggest that our natural language processing and machine learning framework could help provide an early indication of the spread of COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Library of Medicine (NLM) grant R01LM011176 and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) grant R01AI117011.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe annotated data that was used to train the classifier for the evaluation in this study is available as a supplemental file with this article. Tweets annotated as “other,” “probable,” and “possible” are labeled as “0,” “1,” and “2,” respectively. To download the tweets, a Python script is available at https://bitbucket.org/pennhlp/twitter_data_download/src/master/.