RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Sex Differences in the Acute Effects of Oral THC: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Human Laboratory Study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.11.29.23299193
DO 10.1101/2023.11.29.23299193
A1 Aghaei, Ardavan Mohammad
A1 Spillane, Lia Urban
A1 Pittman, Brian
A1 Flynn, L. Taylor
A1 De Aquino, Joao P.
A1 Nia, Anahita Bassir
A1 Ranganathan, Mohini
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/12/2023.11.29.23299193.abstract
AB Rationale Recent reports have shown increased cannabis use among women, leading to growing concerns about cannabis use disorder (CUD). Some evidence suggests a faster progression to addiction in women, known as the “telescoping effect.” While there is preclinical evidence suggesting biological sex influences cannabinoid effects, human research remains scant. We investigated sex differences in the response to oral tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in humans.Methods 56 healthy men and women with prior exposure to cannabis but no history of CUD participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, human laboratory study where they received a single 10 mg dose of oral THC (dronabinol). Subjective psychoactive effects were assessed by the visual analog scale of “high”, psychotomimetic effects by the Clinician-Administered Dissociative Symptoms Scale and Psychotomimetic States Inventory, verbal learning and memory by Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), and physiological effects by heart rate. Outcomes were regularly measured on the test day, except for the RAVLT, which was assessed once. Peak differences from baseline were analyzed using a nonparametric method for repeated measures.Results Oral THC demonstrated significant dose-related effects in psychotomimetic and physiological domains, but not in RAVLT outcomes. A notable interaction between THC dose and sex emerged concerning the subjective “high” scores, with women reporting heightened sensations (p=0.05). No other significant effects of sex and THC dose interaction were observed.Conclusion Oral THC yields similar psychotomimetic and physiological effects across sexes, but women may experience a pronounced subjective psychoactive effect. Further research is needed to identify individual vulnerabilities and facilitate tailored interventions addressing CUD.Competing Interest StatementJ.P.D. has been supported in clinical trials by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, specifically through medication provisions. Additionally, J.P.D. has been a compensated consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim. A.B.N is a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee of Synendos Therapeutics AG, Switzerland.Clinical TrialNCT02781519Funding StatementThis study was funded by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); grant number 1R21DA038821-01A1. J.P.D. is supported by the grants K23DA052682 and R21DA057240 from the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA). ABN is supported by the National Institute of Health (NIMH) K12DA000167 grant.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the VA Connecticut Healthcare System and Yale University School of Medicine.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors