TY - JOUR T1 - Polygenic risk, susceptibility genes, and breast cancer over the life course JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.04.17.20069229 SP - 2020.04.17.20069229 AU - Nina Mars AU - Elisabeth Widén AU - Sini Kerminen AU - Tuomo Meretoja AU - Matti Pirinen AU - Priit Palta AU - FinnGen AU - Aarno Palotie AU - Jaakko Kaprio AU - Heikki Joensuu AU - Mark Daly AU - Samuli Ripatti Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/22/2020.04.17.20069229.abstract N2 - Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for breast cancer have potential to improve risk prediction, but there is limited information on their clinical applicability. We set out to study how PRS could help in clinical decision making. Among 99,969 women in the FinnGen study with 6,879 breast cancer cases, the PRS was associated not only with breast cancer incidence but also with a range of breast cancer-related endpoints. Women with a breast cancer PRS above the 90th percentile had both higher breast cancer mortality (HR 2.40, 95%CI 1.82-3.17) and higher risk for non-localized disease at diagnosis (HR 2.94, 95%CI 2.63-3.28), compared to those with PRS <80th percentile. The PRS modified the breast cancer risk of two high-impact frameshift risk variants. Women with the c.1592delT variant in PALB2 (242-fold enrichment in Finland, 263 carriers) and an average PRS (20-80th percentile) had a lifetime risk of breast cancer at 58% (95%CI 50-66%), which increased to 85% (70-100%) with a high PRS (>90th percentile), and decreased to 27% (15-39%) with a low PRS (<20th percentile). Similarly, for c.1100delC in CHEK2 (3.7-fold enrichment; 1,543 carriers), the respective lifetime risks were 27% (95%CI 25-30%), 59% (52-67%), and 18% (13-22%). Among breast cancer cases, a PRS >90th percentile was associated with risk of contralateral breast cancer with HR 1.66 (95%CI 1.24-2.22). Finally, the PRS significantly refined the risk assessment of women with first-degree relatives diagnosed with breast cancer, i.e. the combination of high PRS (>90th percentile) and a positive family-history was associated with a 2.33-fold elevated risk (95%CI 1.57-3.46) compared to a positive family history alone. These findings demonstrate opportunities for a comprehensive way of assessing genetic risk in the general population, in breast cancer patients, and in unaffected family members.Competing Interest StatementA.P. is a member of the Pfizer Genetics Scientific Advisory Panel. H.J. has a co-appointment at Orion Pharma, has received fees from Neutron Therapeutics, and owns stocks of Orion Pharma and Sartar Therapeutics.Funding StatementThe FinnGen project is funded by two grants from Business Finland (HUS 4685/31/2016 and UH 4386/31/2016) and by eleven industry partners (AbbVie Inc, AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Biogen MA Inc, Celgene Corporation, Celgene International II Sàrl, Genentech Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Pfizer Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Maze Therapeutics Inc., Janssen Biotech Inc). This work was supported by the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation [to S.R., A.P., M.P., and H.J.]; University of Helsinki HiLIFE Fellow grants 2017-2020 [to S.R.]; Academy of Finland Center of Excellence in Complex Disease Genetics [grant number 312062 to S.R., 312074 to A.P., 312075 to M.D; 312073 to J.K.; 312076 to M.P.]; Academy of Finland [grant number 285380 to S.R, 128650 to A.P., 308248 to J.K., 288509 to M.P., 218068 and 131449 to H.J.]; The Finnish Innovation Fund Tekes [grant number 2273/31/2017 to E.W.]; Foundation and the Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [grant number 667301 (COSYN) to A.P]; Cancer Foundation Finland sr [to T.M.]; Cancer Society of Finland [to H.J.]; Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation [to H.J.]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe FinnGen data may be accessed through Finnish Biobanks’ FinnBB portal (www.finbb.fi) and THL Biobank data through THL Biobank (https://thl.fi/en/web/thl-biobank). ER -