TY - JOUR T1 - Suppression of COVID-19 outbreak in the municipality of Vo’, Italy JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.04.17.20053157 SP - 2020.04.17.20053157 AU - Enrico Lavezzo AU - Elisa Franchin AU - Constanze Ciavarella AU - Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg AU - Luisa Barzon AU - Claudia Del Vecchio AU - Lucia Rossi AU - Riccardo Manganelli AU - Arianna Loregian AU - Nicolò Navarin AU - Davide Abate AU - Manuela Sciro AU - Stefano Merigliano AU - Ettore Decanale AU - Maria Cristina Vanuzzo AU - Francesca Saluzzo AU - Francesco Onelia AU - Monia Pacenti AU - Saverio Parisi AU - Giovanni Carretta AU - Daniele Donato AU - Luciano Flor AU - Silvia Cocchio AU - Giulia Masi AU - Alessandro Sperduti AU - Lorenzo Cattarino AU - Renato Salvador AU - Katy A. M. Gaythorpe AU - Imperial College London COVID-19 Response Team AU - Alessandra R. Brazzale AU - Stefano Toppo AU - Marta Trevisan AU - Vincenzo Baldo AU - Christl A. Donnelly AU - Neil M. Ferguson AU - Ilaria Dorigatti AU - Andrea Crisanti Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/18/2020.04.17.20053157.abstract N2 - On the 21st of February 2020 a resident of the municipality of Vo’, a small town near Padua, died of pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 infection1. This was the first COVID-19 death detected in Italy since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in the Chinese city of Wuhan, Hubei province2. In response, the regional authorities imposed the lockdown of the whole municipality for 14 days3. We collected information on the demography, clinical presentation, hospitalization, contact network and presence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in nasopharyngeal swabs for 85.9% and 71.5% of the population of Vo’ at two consecutive time points. On the first survey, which was conducted around the time the town lockdown started, we found a prevalence of infection of 2.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-3.3%). On the second survey, which was conducted at the end of the lockdown, we found a prevalence of 1.2% (95% CI 0.8-1.8%). Notably, 43.2% (95% CI 32.2-54.7%) of the confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections detected across the two surveys were asymptomatic. The mean serial interval was 6.9 days (95% CI 2.6-13.4). We found no statistically significant difference in the viral load (as measured by genome equivalents inferred from cycle threshold data) of symptomatic versus asymptomatic infections (p-values 0.6 and 0.2 for E and RdRp genes, respectively, Exact Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test). Contact tracing of the newly infected cases and transmission chain reconstruction revealed that most new infections in the second survey were infected in the community before the lockdown or from asymptomatic infections living in the same household. This study sheds new light on the frequency of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and their infectivity (as measured by the viral load) and provides new insights into its transmission dynamics, the duration of viral load detectability and the efficacy of the implemented control measures.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Veneto Region and was jointly funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID Concordat agreement and is also part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union. I.D. acknowledges research funding from a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship funded by the Royal Society and Wellcome Trust [grant 213494/Z/18/Z]. L.O. and G.C.D. acknowledge research funding from The Royal Society. We thank F. Caldart, M.D., G. Castelli, M.D., M. Drigo, M.D., L. Fava, M.D., B. Labella, M.D., M. Nicoletti, M.D., E. Nieddu, M.D. for assistance in data collection and consistency check, F. Bosa and G. Rupolo from the Italian Red Cross for the support in patient samplings.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe dataset is available as a supplementary file. ER -