PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Turuwhenua, Jason AU - LinTun, Zaw AU - Norouzifard, Mohammad AU - Edmonds, Misty AU - Findlay, Rebecca AU - Black, Joanna AU - Thompson, Benjamin TI - Automated visual acuity estimation by optokinetic nystagmus using a stepped sweep stimulus AID - 10.1101/2024.02.19.23300472 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.02.19.23300472 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/20/2024.02.19.23300472.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/20/2024.02.19.23300472.full AB - Purpose Measuring visual acuity (VA) can be challenging in adults with cognitive impairment and young children. We developed an automatic system for measuring VA using Optokinetic Nystagmus (OKN).Methods VA-OKN and VA by ETDRS (VA-ETDRS) were measured monocularly in healthy participants (n=23, age 30±12). VA was classified as reduced (n=22, >0.2 logMAR) or not (n=24, ≤0.2 logMAR) in each eye. VA-OKN stimulus was an array of drifting (5 deg/sec) vanishing disks presented in descending/ascending size order (0.0 to 1.0 logMAR in 0.1 logMAR steps). The stimulus was stepped every 2 seconds, and 10 sweeps were shown per eye. Eye tracking data determined when OKN activity ceased (descending sweep) or began (ascending sweep) to give an automated sweep VA. Sweep traces were randomized and assessed by a reviewer blinded to VA-ETDRS. A final per sweep VA and VA-OKN was thereby determined.Results A single randomly selected eye was used for analysis. VA deficit group: There was no significant difference between overall mean VA-OKN and VA-ETDRS (p>0.05, paired t-test) and the r2 statistic was 0.84. The 95% limits of agreement were 0.19 logMAR. No VA deficit group: There was a 0.24 logMAR bias between VA-OKN and VA-ETDRS and no correlation was found (r2 = 0.06). However, the overall sensitivity/specificity for classification was 100%.Conclusions A robust correlation between VA-ETDRS and VA-OKN was found. The method correctly detected a VA deficit.Translational relevance OKN is a promising method for measuring VA in cognitively impaired adults and pre-verbal children.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was supported by the Health Research Council of New Zealand (HRC 21/514). BT is supported by InnoHK and the Hong Kong Government.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee. The ethics approval reference is UAHPEC20318I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript