RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 An evaluation of the fracture resistance of endodontically treated extracted teeth restored with Titanium, Carbon and Fibre posts : An in-vitro randomized control trial JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.04.13.20063883 DO 10.1101/2020.04.13.20063883 A1 Sonali Suvadarsini Behera A1 Gopal Krishna Choudhury A1 Abhilash Mohapatra A1 Sandeep Kumar Panigrahi YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/17/2020.04.13.20063883.abstract AB Post and core enforcement is done for Root Canal Treated (RCT) tooth as per need. Several posts and core systems are available claiming superiority. The usual post and core enforcement used in set up in India include that based on titanium and fiber. An unbiased in-vitro randomized control trial to compare the fracture resistance of RCT teeth with those restored with Titanium, Carbon and Fibre posts was hence conducted. The trial was conducted in a tertiary care dental institute in the eastern part of India. A total of 40 normal samples of extracted first mandibular were randomized to four groups (A through D) of ten samples each. Block random design was used, random number sequence was generated through computer centrally. The process was blinded, also during analysis. Group A (control) was RCT teeth with intact coronal structure while group B, C and D (interventional) were RCT teeth restored with titanium, carbon and fiber posts respectively. Universal Testing Machine (‘Tinius Olsen, H50KS’) was used for testing fracture resistance. The data were analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test followed by pairwise comparison in Stata v 12.1 SE. All statistical interpretations were done at p= 0.05 levels. The median fracture resistance among the groups was significantly different (p=0.000). Median fracture resistance of control, titanium, and fiber groups were similar (p >0.05). The median fracture resistance of the carbon group was inferior to all other groups (p<0.05). It was concluded that fiber and titanium post and core systems similar in strength to only root canal treated tooth, and scored better as compared to carbon post and core system.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialIt was an in-vitro trial limited to extracted toothFunding StatementThe study was not funded by any source.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available with the corresponding author and can be produced for personal use on request. Please send requests for data, quoting intent of use and acknowledgment to dr.sandeepvss{at}gmail.com