RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Protein Classifier for Thyroid Nodules Learned from Rapidly Acquired Proteotypes JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.04.09.20059741 DO 10.1101/2020.04.09.20059741 A1 Yaoting Sun A1 Sathiyamoorthy Selvarajan A1 Zelin Zang A1 Wei Liu A1 Yi Zhu A1 Hao Zhang A1 Hao Chen A1 Xue Cai A1 Huanhuan Gao A1 Zhicheng Wu A1 Lirong Chen A1 Xiaodong Teng A1 Yongfu Zhao A1 Sangeeta Mantoo A1 Tony Kiat-Hon Lim A1 Bhuvaneswari Hariraman A1 Serene Yeow A1 Syed Muhammad Fahmy bin Syed Abdillah A1 Sze Sing Lee A1 Guan Ruan A1 Qiushi Zhang A1 Tiansheng Zhu A1 Weibin Wang A1 Guangzhi Wang A1 Junhong Xiao A1 Yi He A1 Zhihong Wang A1 Wei Sun A1 Yuan Qin A1 Qi Xiao A1 Xu Zheng A1 Linyan Wang A1 Xi Zheng A1 Kailun Xu A1 Yingkuan Shao A1 Kexin Liu A1 Shu Zheng A1 Ruedi Aebersold A1 Stan Z. Li A1 Oi Lian Kon A1 N. Gopalakrishna Iyer A1 Tiannan Guo YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/16/2020.04.09.20059741.abstract AB Up to 30% of thyroid nodules cannot be accurately classified as benign or malignant by cytopathology. Diagnostic accuracy can be improved by nucleic acid-based testing, yet a sizeable number of diagnostic thyroidectomies remains unavoidable. In order to develop a protein classifier for thyroid nodules, we analyzed the quantitative proteomes of 1,725 retrospective thyroid tissue samples from 578 patients using pressure-cycling technology and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. With artificial neural networks, a classifier of 14 proteins achieved over 93% accuracy in classifying malignant thyroid nodules. This classifier was validated in retrospective samples of 271 patients (91% accuracy), and prospective samples of 62 patients (88% accuracy) from four independent centers. These rapidly acquired proteotypes and artificial neural networks supported the establishment of an effective protein classifier for classifying thyroid nodules.Competing Interest StatementThe research group of T.G. is supported by Pressure Biosciences Inc, which provides sample preparation instrumentation.Funding StatementThis work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972492) and National Natural Science Fund for Young Scholars (21904107), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (LR19C050001), Hangzhou Agriculture and Society Advancement Program (20190101A04). Further support for this project was obtained from the National Cancer Centre Research Fund (Peter Fu Program) and National Medical Research Council Clinician-Scientist Award (NMRC/CSAINV/011/2016), both in Singapore. The prospective study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81902726), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (NO. 2018M641739), Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (20180530090).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are available in the manuscript or the supplementary material. MS raw data were deposited in iProX (IPX000444000). All the data will be publicly released upon publication.