RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Quantifying Fit-for-Purpose in Real World Data: Data Grading and FitQ Scores
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.02.02.24302239
DO 10.1101/2024.02.02.24302239
A1 Jackson, Michael L.
A1 Manickam, Raj
A1 Derieg, Dan
A1 Gombar, Saurabh
A1 Low, Yen S
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/05/2024.02.02.24302239.abstract
AB Real-world evidence (RWE), derived from analysis of RWD, is increasingly used to guide decisions in drug development, regulatory oversight, and clinical decision-making. Evaluating the fitness-for-purpose of RWD sources is one key component to generating transparent RWE. Here, we demonstrate tools that fill two gaps in the data grading literature. These are the need for quantitative data grading scores, and the need for scoring mechanisms that can be run in automated fashion and at scale. The Real World Data Score (RWDS) rates the overall quality and completeness of a RWD source across a range of customizable metrics. The Fitness Quotient (FitQ) grades how well a specific data source fits a specific RWE query. In concert, these tools give producers and consumers of RWE evidence to assess the quality of the underlying RWD.Competing Interest StatementThe authors are employees of Atropos Health, which sponsored this manuscriptFunding StatementThis study was funded by Atropos HealthAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors