TY - JOUR T1 - Systematic review of distribution models for <em>Amblyomma</em> ticks and Rickettsial group pathogens JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.04.07.20057083 SP - 2020.04.07.20057083 AU - Catherine A. Lippi AU - Holly D. Gaff AU - Alexis L. White AU - Sadie J. Ryan Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/10/2020.04.07.20057083.abstract N2 - The rising prevalence of tick-borne diseases in humans in recent decades has called attention to the need for more information on geographic risk for public health planning. Species distribution models (SDMs) are an increasingly utilized method of constructing potential geographic ranges.There are many knowledge gaps in our understanding of risk of exposure to tick-borne pathogens, particularly for those in the rickettsial group. Here, we conducted a systematic review of the SDM literature for rickettsial pathogens and tick vectors in the genus Amblyomma. Of the 174 reviewed papers, only 24 studies used SDMs to estimate the potential extent of vector and/or pathogen ranges. The majority of studies (79%) estimated only tick distributions using vector presence as a proxy for pathogen exposure. Studies were conducted at different scales and across multiple continents. Few studies undertook original data collection, and SDMs were mostly built with presence-only datasets from public database or surveillance sources. While we identify agap in knowledge, this may simply reflect a lag in new data acquisition and a thorough understanding of the tick-pathogen ecology involved.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementCAL, HDG, and SJR were funded by NIH 1R01AI136035-01. ALW and SJR were additionally funded by CDC grant 1U01CK000510-01: Southeastern Regional Center of Excellence in Vector-Borne Diseases: The Gateway Program. This publication was supported by the Cooperative Agreement Number above from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are within the manuscriptSDMspecies distribution modelENMecological niche modelPRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysesGAMgeneralized additive modelBRTboosted regression treesRFrandom forestsLRlogistic regression (LR)GWRgeographically weighted regressionENFAecological niche factor analysis ER -