RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Extrafascial transfissural approach with finger fracture technique approach for liver resection.Old is still gold?
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.08.20057562
DO 10.1101/2020.04.08.20057562
A1 Bhavin B Vasavada
A1 Hardik Patel
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/10/2020.04.08.20057562.abstract
AB Background We evaluated our protocol of extrafascial transfissural approach for liver resection with intrafascial approach that we use in case of donor hepatectomy.Material and Method We use extrafascial transfissural approach with finger fracture technique for liver resections and inftrafascial approach with clamp crush technique in case of donor hepatectomy. Major hepatectomy defined as resection of 2 or more adjacent segments.We compared these two techniques with regard to blood loss, operative time, morbidity and mortality.We also evaluated over all factors responsible for 90 days mortality.statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 23.(IBM).Categorical factors were evaluated using chi square test and numerical factors were analyzed using Mann Whitney U test. Multivariate analysis was done using logisitic regression method. Ethical approval for our clinical study was obtained by human research COA number SBI 3246.Results We evaluated 26 liver resections done in last three years. 19 liver resections were done using extrafascial transfissural approach for various liver tumors and 7 living donor hepatectomies were done using itrafascial technique with clamp crush methods. Mean age of patients was 50.73 years.16 patients were males and 10 were females. Mean blood loss was 273.9 ml and mean operative duration was 184.7 minutes. 22 were major resections, 4 were minor liver resections. All minor liver resections were in transfissural approach however there was no statistical significant difference between them. Being live liver doners patients in intrafacial group they were younger than extrafascial transfissural group. (p=0.01). There was no statistical significant difference in blood loss, blood products requirements, morbidity, in hospital and 90 days mortality in both the groups. However extrafascial transfissural with finger fracture technique was associated with significant less operative time. (168.13 minutes vs 222.86 minutes) (p=0.006). 90 days mortality was associated with higher ASA grade (0.018) and blood loss (0.008). However in multivariate analysis no factor indepedently predicted mortality.Conclusion Extrafascial transfissural approach significantly reduces operative time, without affecting morbidity and mortality in liver resection.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Trialthis is a retrospective studyFunding Statementno funding obtainedAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData can be given on demand