PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Kumeren N. Govender AU - Teresa L. Street AU - Nicholas D. Sanderson AU - David W. Eyre TI - Metagenomic sequencing as a clinical diagnostic tool for infectious diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis AID - 10.1101/2020.03.30.20043901 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.03.30.20043901 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/08/2020.03.30.20043901.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/08/2020.03.30.20043901.full AB - Background Metagenomics has the potential to revolutionise infectious diseases diagnostics, from rapid species and antimicrobial resistance prediction, to finding unrecognised and sometimes untreated infections. Our aim was to summarise all literature on culture-independent metagenomic sequencing to describe the accuracy of species and antimicrobial resistance prediction and, describe the challenges and progress in the field.Methods We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis from eligible studies retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar and bioRxiv and, assessed risk of bias and quality using the QUADAS-2 tool. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020163777.Findings We identified 36 studies, 22 of which used a species-agnostic approach to identify all possible pathogens. In these studies, the overall sensitivity and specificity of pathogen species detection were 88% (95%CI 81-92%) and 86% (95%CI 70-94%) respectively. Antimicrobial resistance prediction and comparison to phenotypic results was undertaken in six studies. Categorical agreement was 83% (95%CI 68-92%), very major (prediction sensitive, phenotype resistant) and major error (prediction resistant, phenotype sensitive) rates were 9% (95%CI 2-27%) and 1% (95%CI 0-20%) respectively. We report limited use of negative controls in studies 61% (22/36) which contribute to a major challenge of discriminating true pathogens from contamination, where there is no convergence on methodology. More efficient human DNA depletion methods are required as a median of 79% (IQR 62-96) [Range 7-98] of sequences were classified as human despite laboratory depletion techniques. The median time from sample to result was 23·5 hours (7-31) [4-144], with sequencing time accounting 10 hours (4·8-16) [1-16]. The average reported consumables cost per sample ranged from $128 to $685.Interpretation The science and regulatory environment are rapidly developing, and its role as a routine test or test of last resort still needs to be determined, however it is likely that clinical metagenomics will be an increasing part of the clinician’s armamentarium to diagnose infectious diseases in the near future.Funding None.Competing Interest StatementDWE has received lecture fees and expenses from Gilead. No other author has a conflict of interest to declare.Funding StatementThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData available within the article or its supplementary materials.