TY - JOUR T1 - Autonomous Magnetic Resonance Imaging JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.03.30.20047191 SP - 2020.03.30.20047191 AU - Keerthi Sravan Ravi AU - Sairam Geethanath Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/01/2020.03.30.20047191.abstract N2 - Access to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) across developing countries from being prohibitive to scarcely available. For example, eleven countries in Africa have no scanners. One critical limitation is the absence of skilled manpower required for MRI usage. Some of these challenges can be mitigated using autonomous MRI (AMRI) operation. In this work, we demonstrate AMRI to simplify MRI workflow by separating the required intelligence and user interaction from the acquisition hardware. AMRI consists of three components: user node, cloud and scanner. The user node voice interacts with the user and presents the image reconstructions at the end of the AMRI exam. The cloud generates pulse sequences and performs image reconstructions while the scanner acquires the raw data. An AMRI exam is a custom brain screen protocol comprising of one T1-, T2- and T2*-weighted exams. A neural network is trained to incorporate Intelligent Slice Planning (ISP) at the start of the AMRI exam. A Look Up Table was designed to perform intelligent protocolling by optimising for contrast value while satisfying signal to noise ratio and acquisition time constraints. Data were acquired from four healthy volunteers for three experiments with different acquisition time constraints to demonstrate standard and self-administered AMRI. The source code is available online. AMRI achieved an average SNR of 22.86 ± 0.89 dB across all experiments with similar contrast. Experiment #3 (33.66% shorter table time than experiment #1) yielded a SNR of 21.84 ± 6.36 dB compared to 23.48 ± 7.95 dB for experiment #1. AMRI can potentially enable multiple scenarios to facilitate rapid prototyping and research and streamline radiological workflow. We believe we have demonstrated the first Autonomous MRI of the brain.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded [in part] by the Seed Grant Program for MR Studies of the Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute at Columbia University (PI: Geethanath).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be shared upon request. ER -